The Megyn Kelly Show Fatal Flaws in Alex Murdaugh’s Cross Examination, Staying True to Your Convictions, with Mark Geragos, Ronnie Richter, and More | Ep. 500
Feb 24, 2023
Mark Geragos, a high-profile trial lawyer, and Ronnie Richter, a South Carolina lawyer, delve into the Alex Murdaugh double-murder trial, highlighting Murdaugh's lies and the missteps in his cross-examination. They discuss the psychological impact of his testimony on jury perception. Adding a comedic twist, Tony Hinchcliffe shares his childhood experiences and the evolution of comedy through cancel culture. The conversation also touches on personal convictions and friendship dynamics, providing an engaging mix of legal analysis and humor.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Murdaugh's Changing Alibi
- Alex Murdaugh, a former lawyer, is accused of murdering his wife and son.
- He initially lied about his alibi, claiming he was napping, but his son's Snapchat video placed him at the scene.
Murdaugh's Motivation to Testify
- Murdaugh's decision to testify is understandable, given his dire circumstances.
- He faces life in prison for financial crimes, regardless of the murder trial's outcome.
Cross-Examination Strategy
- Effective cross-examination controls the witness with yes/no questions.
- This confirms the questioner's narrative, not extracting new information.