Lisa Herzog discusses challenges in upholding democratic principles in knowledge dissemination post-Trump election and Brexit. The book explores capitalism's influence on knowledge motives, inequality in authority, and need for pluralistic truth evaluation. Reflects on Hegel's influence, practical application of values, and socially situated knowledge sharing for comprehensive reality understanding. Explores experts' unequal authority, proposes partnership model, and emphasizes experts' moral mission. Discusses limitations of lotocratic institutions, advocating for democratic deliberation reforms. Emphasizes collective approach to knowledge as a public good in modern democracies.
The tension between unequal expertise authority and democratic egalitarianism, exacerbated by market influence on knowledge.
Market mechanisms exhibit flaws like preference shaping through advertising, necessitating regulation for knowledge accuracy.
Inclusive workplace democracy fosters better information flow, decision-making, and societal alignment while rebuilding trust in experts.
Deep dives
Challenges in Democracy and Knowledge Generation
The podcast delves into the challenges arising from the interplay between citizen and expert knowledge in democratic processes, fueled by political events like Brexit and the Trump election. Lisa Herzog's motivation to write the book stems from her prior research on ethics in organizations, revealing how knowledge is manipulatively used. The tension between unequal authority in expertise and democratic egalitarianism is highlighted, along with the corrupting influence of markets and capitalism on knowledge.
The Role of Markets in Knowledge Acquisition
The discussion explores the historical narrative of markets as mechanisms for processing decentralized knowledge, emphasizing the idealized function of markets in society. The podcast also critically examines the pitfalls of market mechanisms, such as shaping preferences through advertising, leading to distorted representations of reality. Market regulation is presented as a crucial aspect, with a focus on challenging the prevailing narrative of markets as flawless knowledge aggregators.
Democratic Institutionalism and Epistemic Justice
Democratic institutionalism is discussed as a framework for evaluating the role of markets, experts, and democratic deliberation in conjunction with democratic norms. Lisa Herzog argues for a pragmatic, socially situated approach to knowledge acquisition, emphasizing the need for inclusivity and justice in epistemic communities. The podcast highlights the interconnectedness of justice and knowledge, addressing issues of epistemic injustices based on exclusion and marginalization in societal knowledge generation processes.
Importance of Workplace Democracy for Knowledge Generation
Workplace democracy plays a crucial role in improving epistemic conditions within organizations. Internally, hierarchical organizations often stifle lower-level knowledge from reaching decision-makers, leading to poor internal decisions. Implementing workplace democracy allows for better information flow, enabling employees to share valuable insights, such as understanding customer needs. Externally, democratic firms are more connected to society, fostering input from various citizens and increasing accountability, which can lead to better decision-making and alignment with societal values.
Challenges in the Relationship Between Demos and Experts
The relationship between the general public (demos) and experts faces challenges due to an unequal authority dynamic. Experts are expected to hold knowledge but may face mistrust from the public, especially with instances like replication issues in studies. This imbalance requires a partnership model where experts and society collaborate ethically. Experts must transparently communicate their knowledge's limitations, methods, and uncertainties to rebuild trust through a deeper understanding of science's role and limitations in generating knowledge.