AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The paper addresses two divergent views of intelligence. The evolutionary psychology view sees the mind as a collection of static special purpose mechanisms, while the blank slate view sees the mind as an information sponge that learns from experience.
The paper discusses GPT-3 and its ability to generate plausible text. However, it notes that GPT-3 lacks constraints such as factualness and consistency. GPT-3's performance heavily relies on the patterns it has seen in its training data, and it may not generalize well to novel situations or tasks.
Scaling GPT models by increasing the size or training data is possible but has diminishing returns. The bottleneck is often the training data quality rather than the size of the model. Higher quality data and explicit reasoning models can result in better performance and more effective generalization.
The paper suggests that achieving L5 autonomous driving does not necessarily demonstrate general intelligence. The ability to adapt to new situations and acquire new skills efficiently, especially for unknown tasks, is a better measure of intelligence.
Intelligence is characterized as the ability to efficiently generalize beyond the distribution of previous experiences. It involves both the ability to handle radically new situations and the efficiency in dealing with them. Intelligence can be seen as a ratio between the area of possible situations covered by a behavioral program and the amount of information it starts with. Tests of intelligence should account for knowledge priors and control for training data in order to compare human and artificial intelligence.
Human cognitive abilities exhibit a hierarchical structure with a general factor (G-Factor) at the top. Different tests of intelligence correlate with each other, indicating the presence of a latent variable that explains the observed correlations. The G-Factor captures the common underlying ability that accounts for the correlation between different cognitive tasks. However, the G-Factor does not imply universal intelligence and human abilities remain specialized within the constraints of the human condition.
The Turing test and similar tests that rely on human judgment are not ideal for measuring intelligence in machines. They often lack reliability, standardization, and freedom from bias. Constructing a test for machines that properly measures intelligence requires explicit consideration of knowledge priors and the ability to handle novelty. The goal should be to measure skill acquisition efficiency and generalization to unfamiliar situations, while avoiding reliance on tricks or deceptive methods.
The ARC Challenge is an attempt to embody principles of a good test of machine intelligence and human intelligence. It follows a format similar to classic IQ tests, with tasks that require transforming input grids into proper output grids. The key idea is that every task should only require core knowledge priors, without relying on outside knowledge or concepts. The challenge aims to probe abstraction and the human problem-solving process, revealing tasks that are easy for humans but near impossible for machines.
The idea of intelligence as compression, where cognition is seen as a compression algorithm, is challenged. While compression is a useful tool in cognition, it is not the essence of cognition itself. Cognition is about operating in future situations with uncertainty and novelty, not just compressing the past. The meaning of life, according to François Chollet, lies in the propagation of our actions, thoughts, and creations as reports in the collective edifice of culture. It is through contributing to culture that we create ripples into the future, influencing the minds of future humans and AGI systems.
François Chollet is an AI researcher at Google and creator of Keras.
Support this podcast by supporting our sponsors (and get discount):
– Babbel: https://babbel.com and use code LEX
– MasterClass: https://masterclass.com/lex
– Cash App: download app & use code “LexPodcast”
Episode links:
Francois’s Twitter: https://twitter.com/fchollet
Francois’s Website: https://fchollet.com/
On the Measure of Intelligence (paper): https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.01547
If you would like to get more information about this podcast go to https://lexfridman.com/podcast or connect with @lexfridman on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Medium, or YouTube where you can watch the video versions of these conversations. If you enjoy the podcast, please rate it 5 stars on Apple Podcasts, follow on Spotify, or support it on Patreon.
Here’s the outline of the episode. On some podcast players you should be able to click the timestamp to jump to that time.
OUTLINE:
00:00 – Introduction
05:04 – Early influence
06:23 – Language
12:50 – Thinking with mind maps
23:42 – Definition of intelligence
42:24 – GPT-3
53:07 – Semantic web
57:22 – Autonomous driving
1:09:30 – Tests of intelligence
1:13:59 – Tests of human intelligence
1:27:18 – IQ tests
1:35:59 – ARC Challenge
1:59:11 – Generalization
2:09:50 – Turing Test
2:20:44 – Hutter prize
2:27:44 – Meaning of life
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode