The True Account: Celsus, Origen, and Ideological Esotericism in Late Antiquity
Aug 20, 2020
auto_awesome
Exploring the conflict between Celsus and Origen in late antiquity, focusing on Celsus' anti-Christian polemical work and Origen's refutation. The utilization of esoteric elements in the philosophical discourse between them. Celsus' view of God as the cause of all intelligible things and Origen's response. Criticism of Christians and Jews for rebelling against the true account, and Celsus' depiction of Hellenism as a superior cultural tradition.
The True Account by Celsus highlights the ideological warfare of the third century and the use of esotericism as a polemical weapon.
Kelsus emphasizes the importance of esoteric traditions, ancestral customs, and the role of the Greeks in transmitting the true account.
Deep dives
Kelsus: Origins and Ideological Esotericism in Late Antiquity
Kelsus, a middle-Platonist philosopher, published the first known anti-Christian polemical work called 'Ho'alethess Logos' (the true account). This stirred controversy between Kelsus and Origen, a Christian esotericist. While Kelsus' true account is lost, Origen's Contra Kelsom refutes his anti-Christian claims. Kelsus is depicted as an eclectic philosopher with influences from Plato, but Origen calls him an Epicurean, potentially as a pejorative term. Kelsus emphasizes the importance of esoteric traditions and the ancient wisdom transmitted by various nations and sages, especially the Greeks, in the true account. He claims that the Christians reject dialectic and lack tradition, positioning them as inferior to the Hellenes and other tradition-upholding cultures. Kelsus also criticizes Jews for their refusal to accept pluralism in worship and their perceived rejection of societal norms. Kelsus' work provides insights into the ideological warfare of the third century and the use of esotericism as a polemical weapon.
Kelsus' Metaphysical Views and Esotericism
Kelsus, a Platonist perennialist, posits a transcendent highest principle, God, that cannot be comprehended by thought and is beyond qualities, motion, and change. He advocates for an ineffable mode of cognition, called noesis, through which the adept can have a noetic experience of God. Kelsus aligns with apophatic Platonism, emphasizing the transcendence and ineffability of God. Origen concurs with Kelsus' metaphysical points, but cites scriptural evidence to substantiate them. The passage of knowledge through esoteric hints, as seen in Plato's dialogues, is also highlighted by Kelsus and Origen. Both philosophers recognize the value of esotericism in expressing and understanding the true account.
Kelsus' Cultural Polemics and a Platonist Esoteric Hellenism
Kelsus emphasizes the importance of the ancient and wise nations and sages in transmitting the true account. He associates the true account with a common account of reality and law and highlights the cultural institutions of Hellenism. Kelsus assigns a special place to the Greeks, considering them best suited to judge beliefs by argument or proof. He privileges Plato as the exemplary philosopher who expresses the true account in an esoteric manner, using dialectic and hints rather than straightforward exposition. Kelsus criticizes Christians and Jews as deviating from the common tradition and lacking proper adherence to ancestral customs. Kelsus' construction of an esoteric Hellenism in which wisdom is transmitted through ages and progressively improved demonstrates the stirrings of a single, dominant ideology that would gain momentum in the following centuries.
Conclusion and Significance of Kelsus' Work
Kelsus' anti-Christian polemical work provides valuable insights into the ideological warfare of the third century. His emphasis on esoteric traditions, the role of esotericism in expressing and understanding the true account, and the importance of ancestral customs contribute to the history of esoteric thought in antiquity. Kelsus also foreshadows the emergence of a single, dominant ideology in the fourth century, reflected in the battle lines drawn between Christianity and other philosophical traditions. The significance of Kelsus' work lies in its exploration of esotericism as a polemical tool, its portrayal of different cultural and philosophical traditions, and its role in shaping the development of Western esotericism.
An almost-unknown Middle Platonist philosopher named Celsus wrote the first-known anti-Christian polemical pamphlet some time in the later second century. This is The True Account. It is esoteric.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode