Consider This from NPR Closing arguments for Trump's trial have been made. What now?
May 28, 2024
In this discussion, Adam Schlawhead, a jury expert and professor at Fordham Law School, dives into the final moments of Donald Trump's New York hush money trial. He analyzes the closing arguments, comparing the prosecution's cohesive narrative against the defense's shortcomings. Schlawhead also delves into the complexities of jury selection in high-profile cases, emphasizing the challenge of impartiality. With testimonies from key witnesses like Michael Cohen, he sheds light on how the jury dynamics could sway the trial's outcome.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Defense Strategy
- Trump's defense had two possible strategies: a precise, strategic approach, or a "scorched earth" tactic.
- They chose a mix, focusing on discrediting Michael Cohen, but lacked a compelling counter-narrative.
Blanche's Plea
- Trump's lawyer, Todd Blanche, asked the judge not to send Trump to prison, which is unusual in closing arguments.
- Judge Mershon reacted strongly because the jury shouldn't consider sentencing during the trial.
Prosecution Tactics
- The prosecution, led by Joshua Steinglass, aimed to present a comprehensive view of the evidence.
- They connected all pieces, countering the defense's focus on Michael Cohen's credibility.