The speakers discuss women's voting rights and joke about taking them away. They express disapproval of a queer individual winning a Streamy Award. Discussions on allyship, the trans community, and derogatory jokes also arise.
The podcast debates whether women should be stripped of their voting rights, arguing that the internet provides them with enough information to make informed decisions without the need to vote.
The hosts express discontent over award recognition, suggesting that personal identity or orientation should not be the sole basis for awards, and that talent should be prioritized instead.
Deep dives
The Influence of the Internet on Voting Rights
The podcast discusses the idea of stripping women of their voting rights, suggesting that since they have access to the internet and a wealth of information at their fingertips, voting is unnecessary. The speaker believes that women need to be educated instead of being given the right to vote. They argue that with the internet and technology, women have all the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions without the need to vote.
Preferences and Biases in Award Recognition
The podcast touches on the topic of award recognition and specifically refers to the Streamy Award won by Dylan Mulvaney, a queer creator. The hosts express their discontent, claiming that Mulvaney received preferential treatment solely because of their queer identity. They voice their belief that talent should be the basis for awards, rather than personal identity or orientation. Furthermore, they question why they have not received similar recognition despite having more views and engagement on their content.
1.
Discussion on Women's Voting Rights and Dylan Mulvaney's Streamy Award