Everyone Hates Ticketmaster, but Is It a Monopoly?
May 24, 2024
auto_awesome
Legal expert Eriq Gardner and host Matt discuss the U.S. government's monopoly lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation. They explore the history of the merger, why concert prices may not go down post-split, impact on secondary markets, and what a divided Ticketmaster–Live Nation might entail.
The lawsuit aims to break Live Nation's dominance in concert promotion by addressing anti-competitive behaviors and exclusive venue control.
Debates on ticket pricing highlight the challenge of justifying high fees, emphasizing the need for market competition and fee transparency.
Deep dives
Antitrust Lawsuit Against Live Nation and Ticketmaster
The federal government sues Live Nation and Ticketmaster, accusing them of anti-competitive practices, such as imposing hefty fees on consumers and pressuring artists to use their services. This lawsuit aims to break up the dominant position Live Nation holds in concert promotion, arguing they manipulate artists and venues for exclusivity. Despite the complexities and the potential impact on the industry, including the relationship between concert promotion and ticketing, the outcome remains uncertain.
Debates on Ticket Pricing and Monopoly Allegations
The focus on ticket pricing and anti-competitive behaviors raises debates about consumer benefits and market dynamics. Live Nation and Ticketmaster defend their practices, attributing high ticket prices primarily to artists' preferences and market demand. Critics argue that the breakup may not lead to lower prices, highlighting the challenge of justifying business practices and emphasizing the psychological impact of hidden fees on consumers. The discussion also delves into the liabilities associated with controlling exclusive venues and essential services in the industry.
Prospects and Legal Procedure Ahead
Despite the initial stock fluctuations and industry speculations, the future for Live Nation and Ticketmaster hinges on a lengthy legal process and potential settlements. The antitrust lawsuit involves complex dynamics, including state involvement and implications for consumer protection. Analysts ponder potential outcomes such as breaking exclusivity arrangements, thereby fostering market competition and addressing fee transparency issues. While uncertainties loom over the ultimate resolution, the lawsuit signifies a pivotal moment for antitrust scrutiny in the live entertainment sector.
Matt is joined by Puck’s Eriq Gardner to discuss the U.S. government's monopoly lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation (02:58). They briefly go through the history of the Ticketmaster–Live Nation merger, what lead to the eventual lawsuit, why concert prices won’t go down even if the two companies split, whether this lawsuit is just a PR attack against Ticketmaster, what impact this could have on the secondary markets, what a broken up Ticketmaster–Live Nation would look like, and more. Matt finishes the show with a prediction for this weekend’s holiday box office (27:00).
For a 20 percent discount on Matt’s Hollywood insider newsletter, ‘What I’m Hearing ...,’ click this link: puck.news/thetown