Inez Stepman: The Department of Education deserves to die
Mar 21, 2025
auto_awesome
Inez Stepman, an education policy expert and contributor to the Independent Women's Forum, joins the conversation to challenge the relevance of the Department of Education. She supports Trump’s executive order to close it, claiming it has only led to bureaucratic bloat without benefitting students. Stepman argues that shifting control to states may reduce costs and improve outcomes. The discussion critiques federal policies, revealing how they have failed to address educational disparities despite increased funding, and explores the implications for students and schools.
The proposed closure of the Department of Education is projected to have minimal effects on public school funding, which largely comes from state and local sources.
Eliminating the Department of Education could grant schools increased autonomy by reducing bureaucratic regulations and allowing for more responsive management of student needs.
Deep dives
Impact of Closing the Department of Education
The closure of the Department of Education is expected to have minimal impact on parents with children in public schools. This is because the department does not employ teachers or directly manage educational institutions. Instead, approximately 90% of K-12 education funding comes from state and local sources, leaving only about 10% that is federally managed. Ultimately, this means that funding will simply return to the states without disrupting the educational services currently provided.
Reforming Compliance and Control
One of the significant changes resulting from closing the Department of Education involves reducing bureaucratic control over schools' operations. The department has historically administered various compliance programs that impose restrictions on how schools manage discipline and interpret civil rights legislation. By eliminating these controls, schools could have greater autonomy, allowing them to respond to student needs without the bureaucratic overhead. These reforms aim to mitigate compliance burdens that have not proven effective in improving educational outcomes.
Financial Management of Student Loans
With the closure of the Department of Education, the administration of federal student loan programs is anticipated to shift to another agency, likely the U.S. Treasury. The argument persists that the department has not effectively managed student loan debt, which has contributed to rising educational costs. The transition may not lead to a reduction in existing loans but could change operational approaches to managing these loans. Critics argue that the underlying issues of high college costs remain unaddressed, with many students facing debt fueled by inflated tuition rates.
Go to my sponsor https://aura.com/undercurrents to get a 14-day free trial and start protecting your data — because if you don’t, who will?
Become a supporter of the show - just $1 for the first month: https://unherd.com/undercurrents/
Inez Stepman joins Emily to react to Donald Trump’s decision to sign an executive order on Thursday instructing Linda McMahon to begin the process of closing the Education Department. Stepman argues the Department caused an “explosion of bloat” and Trump’s move to shutter it won’t harm students at all.
Watch it on the Undercurrents website: https://unherd.com/undercurrents/