Dr. Laiya Carayannopoulos, a contributor to the Intern at Work Podcast, and Dr. Mike Fralick from The Rounds Table dive into groundbreaking research on rare diseases. They explore novel treatments for ATTR Amyloidosis, discussing the complex misfolding proteins that lead to organ damage and the efficacy of the drug patissiran. The conversation also highlights Donna Dalorson, an investigational therapy for Hereditary Angioedema, showcasing its potential to reduce attacks and improve quality of life for patients.
The Apollo B trial for ATTR amyloidosis demonstrated a statistical improvement in functional capacity but questioned its overall clinical relevance for patient care.
The OASIS-HAE trial showed a promising 90% reduction in hereditary angioedema attacks, but uncertainties about the long-term effectiveness of the treatment remain.
Deep dives
Understanding ATTR Amyloidosis
ATTR amyloidosis is a systemic condition characterized by the misfolding and deposition of trans-thyretin proteins in various organs, predominantly affecting the heart in its wild-type form. The Apollo B trial investigated the efficacy of patisiran, an RNA interference drug, in improving patient outcomes by reducing these problematic proteins. The study included patients diagnosed with ATTR cardiac amyloidosis and measured outcomes such as functional capacity through the six-minute walk test and quality of life via the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. While the drug showed a statistical reduction in the decline of functional capacity compared to placebo, the actual clinical relevance of this difference remains questionable, prompting concerns about its practical implications for patients.
Efficacy of Dawn for Hereditary Angioedema
The OASIS-HAE trial explored the efficacy of Dawn, an investigational antisense oligonucleotide, in preventing attacks of hereditary angioedema (HAE). This study was distinctive due to its high enrollment success and robust reduction in HAE attacks, showcasing a 90% decrease for those receiving Dawn every four weeks. The significant reduction in emergency room visits highlighted the trial's clinical relevance, especially given the chronicity and life-threatening potential of HAE attacks. However, the short duration of the study raised questions about the long-term effectiveness and safety of the treatment, leaving some uncertainty about the sustained benefits for patients.
Critical Evaluation of Study Findings
Both trials exemplify the need for critical evaluation of clinical study outcomes, particularly in rare diseases where available treatment options are limited. Despite statistical significance in some findings, the actual clinical impact of these drugs can vary greatly, and enhancements in quality of life may not translate effectively into everyday patient experiences. The discussion around minimal clinically important differences further underscores the importance of understanding what real-world improvements look like for patients, prompting the need for continued skepticism and critical analysis in clinical settings. Ultimately, the advancements in treatment options for these rare diseases foster optimism for patients but highlight the necessity of thorough investigation into their true value and applicability.
This week, Dr. Laiya Carayannopoulos from the Intern at Work Podcast and Dr. Mike Fralick from The Rounds Table, our new Medicine Pods collaboration, discuss two recent papers exploring the novel management of two rare diseases – ATTR Amyloidosis and Hereditary Angioedema.