Religious context: Is it important that the Jesus Seminar says Jesus healed a blind man?

The Jesus seminar acknowledges that Jesus "healed" (quote-very-much-unquote) at least one blind man. How excited should we be about this? I argue that this is barely admitting anything more than the falsehood of Jesus mythicism. So it isn't a big deal. But it does seem that the religious context of Jesus' life is important to the prior probability that he rose from the dead. Next time I will be saying more about what is right in this intuition.