Aaron Regunberg, a lawyer and former Rhode Island politician, dives deep into the urgent fight against Big Oil’s role in climate change. He discusses groundbreaking legal strategies aimed at criminally prosecuting fossil fuel companies, exploring historical parallels to big tobacco. Regunberg outlines the challenges of navigating corporate accountability and highlights the importance of grassroots mobilization for climate justice. He also calls for engaging narrative and collaboration to shift public perception and promote meaningful change. Tune in for an insightful conversation on climate litigation!
The evolving legal strategy to prosecute fossil fuel companies emphasizes the need to hold corporate entities accountable for climate-related harm.
Successful precedents in civil lawsuits are being utilized to establish criminal liability for fossil fuel companies' reckless actions towards the environment.
Gaining public support and effectively framing the narrative around corporate culpability are crucial for advancing climate justice initiatives against Big Oil.
Deep dives
Reimagining Criminal Law for Community Protection
Criminal law is traditionally seen as a means to protect communities from individuals who cause harm. However, there is a growing argument for using this legal framework to hold powerful corporate entities accountable for the harm they cause, particularly in relation to climate change. This approach seeks to shift the focus from predominantly targeting marginalized communities to addressing the threats posed by fossil fuel companies that contribute significantly to environmental degradation. The move is framed as a necessary evolution of criminal law that prioritizes the safety and welfare of the public against powerful adversaries.
Legal Precedents and Criminal Accountability
The podcast discusses various legal strategies being developed to systematically prosecute fossil fuel companies for their role in climate change. This includes leveraging successful precedents from civil cases that have held corporations accountable for environmental harm and deception, expanding these frameworks into criminal law. With a strong foundation of evidence linking these corporations to reckless conduct, advocates argue that charges such as reckless endangerment and climate homicide can be substantiated. As a result, there is optimism that these criminal pursuits could compel meaningful corporate changes and enhance public safety.
Connecting Corporate Action to Climate Impacts
The legal approach to climate accountability emphasizes the need to establish clear causation between corporate actions and the tangible effects of climate change on communities. This includes demonstrating how the actions of fossil fuel companies have resulted in extreme weather events that directly impact human health and safety. Scientific advancements in climate attribution are making it increasingly possible to link specific events to corporate emissions, paving the way for legal strategies that demand accountability. This narrative is vital in communicating the urgency of climate justice and the role of corporations in exacerbating the crisis.
Public Opinion and the Path to Justice
While there are legal avenues being explored to prosecute fossil fuel companies, gaining public support is essential for meaningful change. The podcast highlights that without broad public understanding and backing, efforts to hold corporations accountable may face significant hurdles. Past disinformation campaigns have successfully swayed public opinion against climate action, complicating the narrative surrounding climate change and accountability. Therefore, nurturing a majority movement that demands corporate responsibility is crucial for shifting the political landscape in favor of proactive climate justice.
The Role of Political Narrative in Climate Action
Effective storytelling is presented as a critical tool for framing the climate crisis within a political context that resonates with the public. The podcast urges that a compelling narrative needs clear villains—specifically, fossil fuel executives—to mobilize collective action against corporate malfeasance. Current political frameworks often fail to address the culpability of these elites, which reinforces public disinterest in climate issues. By focusing on economic populism and establishing a direct connection between corporate actions and societal harm, advocates believe that they can galvanize movement and ultimately drive policy changes.
There's been a major wave of climate litigation over the past 12 months, mostly in civil courts. But groups around the world are figuring out how to make polluting the planet a criminal offence. They're targeting the fossil fuel industries to attempt what governments, so far, are failing to do: Hold Big Oil to account, and stop them dead in their tracks before the whole world goes up in smoke.
Aaron Regunburg is is a lawyer and progressive politician who served as a member of the Rhode Island House of Representatives from 2015 to 2019. Since leaving government, Aaron has become a progressive organiser, serving as senior policy counsel with Public Citizen’s climate program. Aaron joins me to discuss the legal case they're building in order for local and state courts to take big oil companies to criminal trial for their part in causing climate change and human death. He explains the legal layout of those cases, the precedent of criminal liability, what a positive result of these cases could look like, and the different strategies and going after both companies as legal entities and individual CEOs and board members as criminal defendants.
Planet: Critical is 100% independent and community-powered. If you value it, and have the means, become a paid subscriber today.
