A recent report reveals FBI shortcomings before the January 6th insurrection, clarifying local law enforcement's role. The discussion debunks theories about FBI complicity while highlighting growing skepticism towards federal agencies. President Biden's historic pardons and their political repercussions stir debate within the Democratic Party. The hosts share personal anecdotes, like a surprising mug recall and memories of the musical 'Wicked.' They also humorously reflect on the challenge of fitting long movies into their busy schedules.
The Inspector General's report highlights the FBI's procedural gaps in intelligence gathering before the January 6th insurrection, clarifying its lack of responsibility for security oversight.
President Biden's clemency actions, particularly regarding pardons for COVID-19 related nonviolent offenses, reflect shifting political dynamics and voter expectations within his administration.
Deep dives
FBI's Role on January 6th
The FBI's involvement leading up to the January 6th Capitol attack is clarified, highlighting that the agency was not responsible for security or intelligence gathering during the event. Instead, the U.S. Capitol Police and other local law enforcement agencies held that responsibility. The report underscores that while the FBI recognized potential violence prior to the event and took some preparatory steps, it failed to canvass all field offices for specific threats related to the certification process. Although this oversight may not have drastically altered the outcome of events that day, it emphasizes a significant procedural gap in their intelligence gathering efforts.
Informants and Conspiracy Theories
The Justice Department Inspector General's report debunks conspiracy theories suggesting that the FBI instigated the January 6th attack. It confirms that while 26 informants were in Washington, D.C. that day, none were tasked with instigating violence, and four informants went into the Capitol unlawfully, but none of them engaged in violent activities. The report clarifies the nature of the informants' presence, stating that they were there to monitor potential threats from known extremist groups. This finding pushes back against narratives in Congress suggesting FBI involvement in the attack, showing a clear distinction between informant activities and the actions taken by rioters.
Presidential Pardons and Political Implications
President Biden's recent issuance of pardons and commutations drew attention as it included a significant number of people impacted during the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily those previously imprisoned who were transferred to home confinement. Additionally, 39 individuals were pardoned for nonviolent crimes, many of whom demonstrated community contributions. This act has been viewed through a political lens, especially following Biden's prior pardoning of his son Hunter, which garnered mixed reactions from fellow Democrats. As the Biden administration navigates these clemency decisions, there is speculation about future pardons, specifically regarding those involved in politically charged cases, reflecting shifting dynamics within the party and voter expectations.
In a new report, the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Justice looked into FBI shortcomings in the run up to the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection.
Then, President Biden has issued a number of pardons and commutations as he prepares to leave office.
This episode: political correspondent Susan Davis, national justice correspondent Ryan Lucas, congressional correspondent Deirdre Walsh, and White House correspondent Deepa Shivaram.
The podcast is produced by Jeongyoon Han and Kelli Wessinger, and edited by Casey Morell. Our executive producer is Muthoni Muturi.
Listen to every episode of the NPR Politics Podcast sponsor-free, unlock access to bonus episodes with more from the NPR Politics team, and support public media when you sign up for The NPR Politics Podcast+ at plus.npr.org/politics.