
 Today, Explained
 Today, Explained Sarah Palin v. The New York Times
 Feb 14, 2022 
 Eric Wemple, media critic for The Washington Post, delves into the legal battle between Sarah Palin and The New York Times over a damaging editorial. They discuss the implications this trial has on media protections, especially amidst rising political violence and misinformation. Wemple emphasizes the challenges public figures face against media narratives and reflects on the landmark New York Times v. Sullivan case, which established vital press freedoms. Ultimately, the conversation raises questions about journalistic accountability and the future of media law. 
 AI Snips 
 Chapters 
 Transcript 
 Episode notes 
The Shootings
- In 2017, James Hodgkinson opened fire at a Republican baseball practice.
- This and the 2011 Gabby Giffords shooting prompted a New York Times editorial.
The Editorial
- The New York Times editorial linked Sarah Palin's PAC map to the 2011 Giffords shooting.
- However, investigations had already debunked this connection.
Palin's Burden of Proof
- To win, Palin must prove the Times knew the claim was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.
- This means proving the Times had serious doubts about the claim's accuracy.
