Everyday AI Podcast – An AI and ChatGPT Podcast

EP 181: New York Times vs. OpenAI: The huge AI implications no one is talking about

Jan 9, 2024
A major legal battle is unfolding as the New York Times sues OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement. The hosts break down the lawsuit's implications for AI and journalism. They offer a humorous critique, claiming the NYT's arguments are poorly researched. Discussion highlights how AI models, including GPT-4, may have unwittingly copied content. With the landscape of generative AI evolving, listeners hear insights on the delicate balance between technological advancement and copyright law.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Overlooked Implications

  • The New York Times' lawsuit against OpenAI has significant implications.
  • These implications are being overlooked amidst the headline-grabbing news.
INSIGHT

Fair Use Argument

  • OpenAI claims training AI models like ChatGPT without copyrighted material is impossible.
  • They argue training on copyrighted work constitutes fair use, offering an opt-out.
INSIGHT

Weak Evidence

  • The New York Times' 69-page filing against OpenAI lacks strong evidence of copyright infringement.
  • It relies heavily on screenshots of ChatGPT outputs without proper sourcing or context.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app