

My Reaction to Jordan Peterson's Move to the US
16 snips May 14, 2025
Jordan Peterson's controversial move to the U.S. sparks an engaging discussion on whether it was the right choice. The speaker critiques the U.S. as the supposed champion of free speech and emphasizes the need for personalized relocation based on individual goals. They delve into the shifting landscape of freedom and safety, comparing the U.S. with countries like Canada and Malaysia. Finally, the podcast explores the misconceptions about relocating, urging listeners to consider global alternatives that might better align with their values.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Peterson's Move: Slight Improvement
- Jordan Peterson left Canada for the US due to professional licensing issues and feeling unfairly treated.
- Andrew Henderson argues this move is only to a slightly better place, not the best for freedom or treatment.
Freedom in US Is Conditional
- The US is not a freedom of speech utopia; freedom there is conditional and culturally limited.
- Both Canada and the US have trending declines in freedoms since 9-11, undermining assumptions about US exceptionalism.
Smaller Countries Adapt Faster
- Large governments in both Canada and the US exhibit incompetence, but smaller countries adapt faster for better capitalism and openness.
- Countries like El Salvador have rapidly improved safety and openness, unlike sluggish big governments.