The Decibel Why the judge in the Hockey Canada trial dismissed a second jury
May 20, 2025
Robyn Doolittle, a staff reporter for The Globe and Mail, provides insightful analysis on the recent developments in the Hockey Canada trial. She discusses the dramatic dismissal of the jury for a second time, shedding light on the implications for the complainant, E.M., who will avoid retesting. The conversation touches on allegations of jury bullying and how these led to concerns over impartiality. Doolittle also explores the complexities of consent and the contrasting narratives presented in court, revealing the challenges of such a high-profile case.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Jury Feels Bullied By Defense Lawyers
- A juror's note claimed multiple jurors felt bullied by two defense attorneys, accusing them of unprofessional behavior.
- The judge dismissed the jury to protect the trial's fairness and avoid retraumatizing the complainant by a new jury selection.
Juror Interaction Sparks First Mistrial
- On day one, a juror said a defense lawyer approached them at lunch, which jurors found inappropriate and discussed among themselves.
- This incident fractured jurors' trust in the defense's respect for trial rules, contributing to the first mistrial.
Central Dispute Over Consent
- EM alleges a sexual assault involving multiple players after consensual sex with one player.
- Defense claims she initiated group sexual activity, making consent the central issue of the case.