Why many people on death row will never be executed
Dec 2, 2024
auto_awesome
Mark Berman, a criminal justice reporter for The Washington Post, dives deep into the complexities of the American death penalty system. He discusses why over 2,000 individuals on death row may never face execution due to factors like moratoriums and court orders. The conversation highlights the emotional toll on inmates and victims' families, revealing a fractured justice system struggling with moral dilemmas and declining public support for capital punishment. Berman sheds light on the implications of this prolonged limbo for justice in America.
Many death row inmates face indefinite delays in their executions, highlighting systemic issues within the American justice system and its fairness.
Public support for the death penalty has waned significantly, prompting states to reconsider their capital punishment policies and practices.
Deep dives
The Kill-for Murderers Case
A crime spree occurred in Pittsburgh in late 1979, resulting in the killings of four individuals, including a young police officer named Leonard Miller. The perpetrators, Michael Trevaglia and John Lesko, were dubbed the kill-for murderers due to the apparent lack of motive behind their actions. Following their capture by dedicated police detectives, both men confessed and were sentenced to death; however, the execution of their sentences has been delayed for decades. This prolonged wait raises troubling questions about justice for the victims' families, especially for those who mourn the loss of Officer Miller, the first Black police officer in the borough.
Death Row Limbo in America
Many death row inmates, like John Lesko, face lengthy delays in the execution of their sentences, often due to appeals and state moratoriums on executions. Pennsylvania, for instance, has not carried out an execution since 1999, and this trend is seen across various states in the U.S., with over half of death row inmates currently in states where executions are paused. The inconsistency has led to a situation where these individuals spend decades awaiting a fate that may never come, which raises fundamental questions about the effectiveness and fairness of the justice system. The ongoing limbo fosters a sense of cruelty, as both proponents and opponents of the death penalty express concern over the emotional toll it takes on all parties involved.
Shifting Perspectives on Capital Punishment
Attitudes toward the death penalty have evolved significantly over the past few decades, with decreasing public support and logistical issues complicating the execution process. Polling data indicates that support for capital punishment has dropped from around 80% in the mid-1990s to about 53% in recent years, reflecting growing concerns about its fairness and the risk of wrongful executions. Various states have begun to rethink their stance on the death penalty, with some abolishing it entirely or implementing moratoriums. The discussion surrounding capital punishment has become more nuanced, with individuals grappling with complex emotions relating to justice for victims and the moral implications of executing those sentenced to death.
Today, why so many people on death row will likely never be executed and what this says about the American justice system.
Read more:
Today, more than 2,000 people sit on American death rows. But some may never see an execution chamber. Between moratoriums, court orders and other official edicts, many people on death row are left in a state of indefinite limbo.
Host Martine Powers speaks with criminal justice reporter Mark Berman about the state of the death penalty in America and what those languishing on death row symbolize about the American justice system.
Today’s show was produced by Ariel Plotnick, with help from Sabby Robinson and Rennie Svirnovskiy. It was edited by Maggie Penman, with help from Monica Campbell, and mixed by Justin Gerrish. Reshma Kirpalani provided tape from video interviews. Thank you to Efrain Hernandez Jr.