The Mirror or the Mask, 4 of 7: Equivocation, Plutarch, and Differences Between Accounts

In my recent book, The Mirror or the Mask: Liberating the Gospels from Literary Devices, I argue that the Gospels are historical reportage. This argument involves both positive evidence for literal accuracy and arguments against the views of Michael Licona, Craig Evans, and others that the evangelists felt free to make historical changes due to the literary conventions of their time. Dr. Licona has recently released a video series in which he claims to refute my work in The Mirror or the Mask. In this series, I respond. If you're interested in more information on these issues, please see the accompanying blog posts and, most importantly, The Mirror or the Mask itself.  In this episode, I discuss how equivocation on terms creates confusion in this discussion. I also give examples of how the literary device model is even a misguided way to approach secular historical works like the writings of Plutarch.  My deepest thanks to Immanuel Fellowship Church for their studio facilities and hard work in helping me to put together this video series.   This episode was originally published on Jul 17, 2020 on YouTube.

Associated blog post:  https://lydiaswebpage.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-licona-series-equivocation-plutarch.html  The Mirror or the Mask: https://www.amazon.com/Mirror-Mask-Liberating-Gospels-Literary/dp/1947929070  Michael Licona, Why Are There Differences in the Gospels? https://www.amazon.com/Why-Are-There-Differences-Gospels/dp/0190264268  Lydia McGrew on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/lydia.mcgrew.5    Mike Licona's video series on my work: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpPGCP1zKznR06Jxb5RaQYrNIiH7xR7ZR