Everything Hertz 35: A manifesto for reproducible science
8 snips
Jan 20, 2017 A new paper sparks a lively discussion on the need for reproducible science. The importance of registered reports and incentivizing change takes center stage. Concerns over copyediting quality and economic pressures in publishing are highlighted. The hosts dive into the challenges of double-blind study analysis and the ongoing replication crisis. They also critique reliance on metrics for hiring and promote open science practices. The conversation wraps up with humor, teasing future innovations and fostering a sense of community.
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Intro
00:00 • 2min
Reproducibility Revolution
01:45 • 7min
Navigating Reproducibility in Science
09:15 • 27min
Concerns Over Copyediting Standards in Academic Publishing
35:57 • 2min
The Economics of Scientific Publishing and Open Access
37:34 • 3min
Navigating Double-Blind Study Analysis
40:24 • 8min
A Playful Conclusion with Future Prospects
48:48 • 1min