Anthony Comstock, the man who tried to stamp out pornography in the final decades of the 19th century, used the US Postal Service as his weapon. Gary Gerstle tells his story, exploring the power of the Post Office, the historical suppression of vice in the US, and the challenges of regulating information in the internet age.
Anthony Comstock used the US Postal Service as a national censorship mechanism to regulate and censor materials he deemed immoral.
The story of Anthony Comstock highlights the conflict between moralizers and free thinkers, as well as the challenges faced by the federal government in regulating content in the modern information age.
Deep dives
The Rise of Anthony Comstock
Anthony Comstock, born into a devout Protestant family, grew up with a deep concern for the moral crisis he believed was engulfing America. He took it upon himself to eliminate what he considered to be obscene material, leading him to become a powerful figure in the fight against immorality. Through his position as the inspector for the U.S. Postal Service, Comstock had the authority to inspect and confiscate anything he deemed obscene passing through the post office. Supported by the New York Society for the Suppression of Vice, he successfully lobbied Congress to pass the Comstock Act in 1873, which defined obscenity broadly and aimed to eliminate knowledge about sex, including birth control and abortion.
The Power of the Postal Service
Comstock's influence was amplified through the U.S. Postal Service, which he used to regulate and censor materials he deemed immoral. The postal service, as a federal institution, gave Comstock the opportunity to establish a national censorship mechanism. He raided publishing houses, confiscated obscene materials, and even jailed individuals. Comstock's meticulous records reveal the immense volume of materials confiscated and the significant impact he had on the production and distribution of erotic content. Although there was resistance and pushback, Comstock's influence remained strong for several decades.
Shifts in Moral Climate and Government Power
The story of Anthony Comstock reflects the intersection of conflicts between moralizers and free thinkers, as well as the struggle between federal and state governments. While the moralizers saw the power of the federal government as a means to control immorality, the story also reveals the challenges faced by the federal government in regulating content in the modern information age. Unlike Comstock's era, there is no agency or mechanism currently in place to regulate obscene material on the internet. Additionally, the political climate has shifted, with some Republicans now advocating for state empowerment rather than federal intervention. However, the success in restricting access to abortion at the state level raises questions about whether a similar approach could be applied to regulate obscenity and pornography.
Gary Gerstle tells the story of Anthony Comstock, the man who tried to stamp out pornography in the final decades of the nineteenth century, using the US Postal Service as his weapon. Where he succeeded and how he ultimately failed still has echoes now, even in the age of the internet.
Talking Points:
States were exempted from the Bill of Rights from the 1790s until essentially the 1960s.
Some states pursued extraordinary influence over the lives of their citizens.
There were always states that were more liberal and more repressive.
For many Americans, the government was the state government.
Anthony Comstock was a moral crusader who used the postal service as the vehicle of anti-vice politics at the federal level.
The federal government can only exercise the powers mentioned in the constitution.
The constitution doesn’t give the government the power to regulate morals but it does give the government power over the post office.
The post office was a large and efficacious bureaucracy.
Any mail traveling between states was carried by a federal agency; Comstock seized upon this as a national censorship mechanism.
Today, the dynamics have largely reversed. Instead of seeing the federal government as a way to control states, today’s moralists want to punt things back to the states.
This has been particularly effective in the case of abortion.