#103 America Unplugged - AU: COVID RETURN. PROUD BOY JOE BIGGS 17 YEARS IN JAIL
Sep 2, 2023
auto_awesome
The podcast discusses the media's role in creating fear around COVID-19, the influence of media in shaping compliance, data mining algorithms, the captivating nature of Donald Trump's support, opposition to lockdowns led by Trump and DeSantis, sentencing disparities, frustration with the justice system, and upcoming events and book suggestions.
Growing concern about COVID lockdowns and mandates, fueled by media fear-mongering and calls for compliance.
Donald Trump's contradictory statements position him as an opposition leader against COVID measures, highlighting hypocrisy.
Unjust sentencing of individuals involved in the January 6th events raises concerns about a broken judicial system and lack of fair treatment.
Deep dives
The Return of COVID Lockdowns and Mandates
There is growing concern about the possibility of COVID lockdowns and mandates being reintroduced in light of new variants. The media is fueling fear and pushing for compliance with mask mandates and vaccine requirements. While some school districts in Texas and Kentucky have already experienced temporary closures, it is unlikely that widespread lockdowns will occur. However, there are rumors and speculation surrounding these measures, and it's important to remain vigilant.
Analyzing Donald Trump's Opposition Stance
Donald Trump's recent statements positioning himself as the leader of the opposition against COVID mandates and lockdowns have raised eyebrows. However, his comments contradict his previous involvement in implementing measures such as lockdowns and promoting vaccines. It is crucial to note the hypocrisy in his statements and the need to critically analyze the intentions behind his new stance. Furthermore, the excessive sentencing of individuals like Joe Biggs, who participated in the January 6th events, highlights the unjust treatment of those involved, while prominent figures seem to face little to no consequences.
Navigating Injustice and Unjust Sentencing
The unjust sentences and sentencing of individuals involved in the events of January 6th, such as Joe Biggs, raise concerns about a broken system and the lack of fair treatment. While individuals who participated face severe punishment, other instances of civil unrest, like the riots in Portland, Oregon, received less attention and consequences. This injustice calls into question the credibility of an unfair judicial system and the need for justice to be blind and independent of political bias.
The Campaign of Deception and Control
The podcast episode discusses how former President Donald Trump is being used as a figurehead to control and deceive the opposition. The speaker emphasizes that while Trump may speak to the emotions of those who oppose certain policies and beliefs, he ultimately failed to deliver on his promises during his presidency. The podcast argues that Trump's actions and rhetoric are part of a psychological and psychographical operation to manipulate the alternative and conspiracy-minded individuals, while also serving as an IQ test to gauge the level of critical thinking among the population. The speaker highlights the danger of this manipulation and expresses concern that this tactic will only grow stronger in the future.
Inconsistencies in Prosecution and Opposition
The podcast episode criticizes the inconsistent treatment of political protests and demonstrations by the authorities. The speaker points out the double standards in how events like the Capitol riot on January 6th, 2021, are perceived and handled compared to other gatherings or movements. The discussion highlights the unjust imprisonment and lack of due process for individuals associated with the January 6th incident, while questioning the motives behind such prosecution. Additionally, the speaker raises concerns about the politicization of the law and the suppression of dissenting opinions, using figures like Donald Trump and Alex Jones as scapegoats for thought crimes. The podcast stresses the need for consistency and fairness in upholding the law, regardless of one's political affiliation.