AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Snipd AI
Lanny Davis, Attorney and Sara Azari, Criminal Defense Lawyer debate whether Trump is guilty in the January 6th case. The prosecution argues criminal intent, while the defense claims Trump acted under legal advice. Topics discussed include conspiracy, Trump's belief in election irregularities, presidential immunity, and the First Amendment's protection of speech.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The prosecution argues that Donald Trump knowingly conspired to obstruct the election results by spreading false claims about voter fraud.
- The defense claims that Trump genuinely believed in election irregularities and relied on the advice of his lawyers, arguing that disagreement and reliance on counsel's advice do not constitute criminal intent.
Deep dives
The trial in Washington, D.C. charging Donald Trump with interfering in the 2020 election
Donald Trump is facing a federal trial accusing him of interfering in the 2020 election, with a specific focus on his attempt to block the certification of the election results. The trial comes three years after the invasion of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters on January 6th.
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode