Sophie Hurwitz, a politics and social movements reporter at Mother Jones, joins Michael S. Roth, president of Wesleyan University, to dissect the evolving landscape of campus protests. They delve into universities' attempts to manage student activism amid rising tensions over free speech. Key discussions include the fear of surveillance that deters student protests, the emotional complexities surrounding issues like the situation in Gaza, and the vital role of youth engagement in shaping future electoral processes.
Many universities have imposed stricter protest regulations, often involving police oversight, raising concerns about free expression and student rights.
Wesleyan University's president advocates for student activism and open dialogue, enhancing constructive engagement while respecting student voices during protests.
Deep dives
Increased Surveillance and Restrictions on Protests
Many universities have implemented stricter protest policies in response to last year's unrest and ongoing social issues. A report indicated that nearly a hundred campuses changed their guidelines, often requiring students to register any gathering involving more than a specified number of participants, which varies by institution. This shift reflects a growing trend of universities incorporating police involvement to enforce policies against protests, leading to concerns about vague definitions around terms like 'public safety.' Students and faculty often felt blindsided by these sudden changes, as many of the new rules were announced without adequate consultation of the affected communities.
Case Studies Highlighting Policy Changes
Specific examples from institutions such as Carnegie Mellon and the University of Texas at Austin illustrate how these new protest regulations are manifesting. At Carnegie Mellon, any expressive activity involving over 25 students needs prior registration, which students perceive as a means of surveillance. Meanwhile, policies at other schools have become as strict as to reserve the right to charge student protesters for police overtime if protests occur beyond regular hours. These examples draw attention to how many institutions view protest as a threat rather than a fundamental exercise of free expression.
A Different Approach to Campus Protests
In contrast to many universities, Wesleyan University has taken a more open stance on student protests. Michael Roth, the university's president, permitted encampments and maintained that students could express their views without fear of police intervention, as long as they respected property and fellow students. This approach allowed for a productive dialogue between administration and protestors, leading to agreements that acknowledged students' concerns while maintaining campus peace. President Roth further encouraged political engagement among students, asserting that such activism is integral to their education and personal development.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.