Cato Daily Podcast Best of Cato Daily Podcast: Is the Welfare State Justified?
May 16, 2025
In this insightful discussion, Daniel Shapiro, an Associate Professor of Philosophy at West Virginia University and author of 'Is the Welfare State Justified?', tackles the complexities of the welfare state. He critiques advocates' unintended support for market solutions while questioning fairness and intergenerational equity in welfare systems. Shapiro also emphasizes the significance of contractual rights in retirement and explores the conflict between coercive policies and market alternatives, inviting a broad ideological dialogue on personal responsibility and informed healthcare choices.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Welfare State Defense Backfires
- Daniel Shapiro argues traditional values used to defend the welfare state ironically support market-based alternatives.
- Principles like fairness and community suggest opposing the traditional welfare state despite defenders' intentions.
Fairness Favors Private Pensions
- Appeals to fairness in welfare, like using Social Security to compensate for bad luck, can be misleading.
- Private pension systems provide fairer, consistent returns across generations than government-run Social Security.
Genetic Info Empowers Health Control
- Knowing genetic health risks can empower people to proactively manage their health and reduce luck's impact.
- Insurance companies adjust premiums by risk level, so knowledge encourages responsibility and dignity, enhancing fairness.