A podcast that encourages civil discourse and open dialogue. Topics include IVF and surrogacy, consciousness and the value of life, supporting free speech, moral disagreements on abortion, and the objectivity of human value and morality.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Engaging in respectful dialogue with those who hold opposing viewpoints can lead to understanding and mutual respect.
Moral disagreements can coexist without labeling others as wrong, and differing perspectives may not have objective right or wrong answers.
Deep dives
Engaging in Respectful Dialogue with Opposing Viewpoints
Wes, a student at Clemson University, demonstrates the value of engaging in respectful dialogue with those who hold opposing viewpoints. Despite disagreeing with Michael J. Knels' arguments on IVF and surrogacy, Wes attends his speech and asks a question to challenge his views. While Wes did not change his mind, he acknowledges the logical consistency of Knels' arguments and respects his viewpoint. This discussion highlights the importance of open-mindedness, courteous conversation, and the recognition that moral disagreements can exist without labeling others as wrong.
The Complexity of Moral Disagreements
Wes recognizes that moral disagreements, such as the abortion debate, are not easily resolved through logical arguments alone. He believes that beliefs about what gives a human value are subjective and tied to individual moral codes. While acknowledging the logical arguments made by pro-life advocates, Wes maintains his pro-choice stance, understanding that differing moral perspectives can coexist and do not necessarily have objective right or wrong answers.
The Role of Subjectivity and Gut Feelings in Morality
Wes considers the origin of his morals, acknowledging that evolution may have influenced some of his moral inclinations. However, he also acknowledges that there could be a higher power involved in shaping moral beliefs. Despite recognizing the subjective nature of morals, Wes trusts his gut feelings and finds value in listening to different viewpoints without expecting to change his own stance. He emphasizes the collective subjective morality of a society, suggesting that legal and moral norms are determined by the majority's perspectives.
Welcome to another episode of 'Cross The Picket Line' with Michael Knowles, where challenging conversations and open dialogues take center stage. In this riveting installment, Michael visits both Vanderbilt University and Clemson University, extending an invitation to his protesters to engage in face-to-face, friendly sit-down discussions.
'Cross The Picket Line' breaks down barriers, encouraging those who disagree with Michael's views to step forward and share their perspectives in a respectful and constructive setting. This episode showcases the power of civil discourse as Michael and his guests tackle a range of topics, from politics and culture to education and societal issues.
🔔 Join us in this unique journey of understanding and exchange at two renowned campuses. Don't forget to subscribe for more episodes of 'Cross The Picket Line.' Share your thoughts on these discussions in the comments below and suggest which campus Michael should visit next!