Tom Nichols, an author and political columnist for The Atlantic, joins Tim Miller for a lively discussion on the tumultuous political landscape. They dissect Trump's pardons for insurrectionists and the alarming normalizing of such actions. Nichols critiques the influence of tech moguls in politics, questioning the ties between wealth and leadership. They also touch on the emotional repercussions of recent immigration policy shifts and examine the fractured narratives affecting public trust in governance, all delivered with sharp wit and insight.
The podcast critiques Trump's inauguration as low-energy and emblematic of a shallow commitment to presidential duties and principles.
Tom Nichols highlights concerns about Trump's pardons for violent insurrectionists, signaling a dangerous leniency undermining the rule of law.
The discussion emphasizes the troubling intersection of wealth and politics, exemplified by the presence of tech billionaires at Trump's inauguration influencing governance.
Deep dives
The Inauguration's Disappointment
The inauguration of Donald Trump is critiqued as a shameful event, marked by a lack of energy and seriousness. Observers noted that Trump's behavior, including his failure to place his hand on the Bible while taking the oath, signaled a disregard for the principles he was supposed to uphold. The overall atmosphere was deemed low energy, in stark contrast to previous inaugurations that aimed for grandeur. The conversation highlights that the inauguration was characterized by shallow rhetoric rather than a genuine commitment to the duties of the presidency.
The Issue of Pardons
The discussion surrounding Trump's pardons reveals a shocking leniency towards individuals convicted of violent offenses against law enforcement during the January 6 insurrection. Noteworthy examples include the pardoning of individuals who assaulted police officers, raising concerns about the undermining of the rule of law. These actions are seen as a dangerous signal that violent acts, particularly those perpetrated in the context of political insurrection, might face minimal consequences. This reflects a larger narrative that suggests Trump's administration is promoting an environment where such violent behavior can go unpunished.
The Tackling of Birthright Citizenship
Trump's stance on birthright citizenship sparks significant concerns regarding the interpretation of constitutional rights in America. The move to potentially undermine established law, particularly as it relates to citizenship for those born in the U.S., is viewed as fundamentally anti-American. Critics emphasize that this disregard for the Constitution presents a dangerous precedent, where the President attempts to alter foundational principles for political gain. The implications of such actions raise alarms about the erosion of civil liberties and the possible repercussions for future generations.
The Rising Influence of Tech Oligarchs
During the inauguration, the presence of wealthy tech CEOs highlights the growing intersection of wealth and politics in America. The gathering of figures like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg at such a pivotal moment suggests a shift towards oligarchic influence on policy and governance. This phenomenon raises concerns about the prioritization of corporate interests over public welfare, as these billionaires may use their wealth to manipulate political outcomes. The emerging dynamic suggests that the new administration may cater to the needs of the tech elite, undermining the principles of democracy.
The Role of Media in Shaping Perceptions
The media's portrayal of Trump's inauguration and subsequent actions has significant implications for public perception and understanding. Reports framing the event as 'normal' or 'normalizing' Trump's erratic behavior detract from the seriousness of his presidency and the historical context of his actions. This coverage risks rendering Trump's radical changes to American governance as acceptable, thereby desensitizing the public to their potential consequences. The reliance on traditional metrics of civility and normality in reporting obscures the alarming departure from democratic norms under Trump's leadership.
Trump tried to pencil out literal words in the Constitution and then freed 1,500 violent insurrectionists—while the media attempted to normalize it all. Meanwhile, much attention is being paid to Elon's salute, and not enough to the facts that he has an office at the White House, he's a government contractor, and paid a quarter of a billion dollars to get Trump elected. Plus, other Trump executive orders were pissy and petty, the 80s can no longer be called the decade of greed after Monday's Hunger Games vibe, and the Democrats are going to have a hard time resisting a risky 'eat the rich' path.
LAST DAY: Make The Bulwark your home for coverage of Trump 2.0. Get 2 months FREE on an annualsubscriptionof Bulwark+ now for exclusive content, ad-free commentary and more:
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode