In a compelling discussion, Constance Grady, Senior Culture correspondent for Vox, sheds light on the chaos engulfing the Miss USA pageant. With recent resignations echoing claims of being 'silenced,' she unpacks allegations of bullying and a toxic environment. The conversation explores whether such pageants still hold relevance in today's culture and the troubling implications of non-disclosure agreements imposed on winners. Grady’s insights challenge the notion of empowerment within such organizations amidst scandal and turmoil.
The recent resignations of Miss USA and Miss Teen USA reveal deep-rooted issues like bullying and toxic workplace culture within the organization.
Financial instability and leadership changes are threatening the relevance of the Miss USA pageant, prompting questions about its future sustainability.
Deep dives
Resignations Signal Deeper Issues
The unexpected resignations of both Miss USA and Miss Teen USA have highlighted significant troubles within the pageant organization. This marked the first time in the history of the Miss USA pageant that two titleholders stepped down in such a short time frame, raising questions about the internal environment. Allegations of bullying, a toxic workplace, and sexual harassment have come to light, with former titleholders attributing their departures to these serious issues. These revelations challenge the public perception of the pageant as an entity that empowers women, exposing a stark contrast between its stated mission and the experiences of its representatives.
Financial Strain and Leadership Instability
Miss USA has faced financial challenges, evidenced by declining ratings and previous controversies surrounding its management, which includes a series of leadership changes. The recent departures followed a pattern of internal discord, including claims of unfulfilled promises regarding payments and threats to withhold salaries for minor infractions. Such instability raises concerns about the sustainability of the organization that relies heavily on the public image of its titleholders to maintain relevance. As the pageant continues to grapple with leadership and financial issues, there is a growing sentiment that it may no longer attract women eager to compete for its crown.
The Impact of NDAs and Organizational Culture
Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) play a significant role in shaping the experiences of titleholders in the Miss USA organization, often trapping them in silence regarding unfair treatment. These contracts frequently require contestants to sign just after being crowned, limiting their ability to voice grievances about workplace issues. Such practices have led to broader public scrutiny, questioning whether the pageant can genuinely empower women while imposing restrictive contractual obligations on its participants. The ongoing criticism of Miss USA emphasizes that until these structural problems are resolved, the organization faces a serious risk of losing credibility and relevance in the modern cultural landscape.
While the What Next team takes some rest, enjoy this episode, originally aired on May 16.
When Miss USA abdicated her throne, people noticed that the first letters of each sentence of her resignation letter spell out “I am silenced.” Shortly thereafter, Miss Teen USA stepped down with a letter that opens with a quote from Nietzsche.
What’s going on at the Miss USA organization? Has the idea of a national pageant outlived its usefulness?
Guest: Constance Grady, senior Culture correspondent for Vox.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.