What Next | Guantanamo Bay’s Comeback Is a Warning
Feb 6, 2025
auto_awesome
Andrea Pitzer, author of 'One Long Night: A Global History of Concentration Camps,' dives into the troubling future of Guantanamo Bay as it prepares to house more detainees under a controversial immigration policy. She unpacks the facility’s contentious past and lack of oversight, exploring its implications on human rights and migrant treatment. By drawing historical parallels to past detention camps, Pitzer warns of repeating mistakes and emphasizes the importance of accountability in today's immigration landscape.
The recent announcement to expand Guantanamo Bay for migrants indicates a troubling potential for human rights abuses and lack of transparency.
Historically, Guantanamo's treatment of Haitian and Cuban migrants reflects systemic discrimination and the precarious nature of asylum rights.
Deep dives
Reopening of Guantanamo Bay
The recent relocation of migrants to Guantanamo Bay highlights concerns regarding the use of this facility, long criticized for its history. This move raises questions about the treatment of these individuals, as the rhetoric used by officials frames them as 'the worst of the worst,' reminiscent of past justifications for detaining suspects. Historical context reveals that this phrase has often been misleading, as many detainees held at Guantanamo were neither dangerous nor high-profile. The danger of reopening such a facility lies in its potential to become a site of ongoing human rights violations and lack of transparency.
Historical Context of Detention
Guantanamo Bay's troubled past includes its role as a detention center for Haitian migrants in the early 1990s, following a military coup. Rather than processing asylum claims on U.S. soil, many migrants were intercepted at sea and sent to Gitmo, where conditions were poor and rights were limited. Discrimination was evident in how Haitian and Cuban migrants were treated, with the former often classified as economic refugees and denied asylum. This historical precedent underscores the institution's ambiguous and often unjust approach to migrant detention.
Long-term Implications and Concerns
The existence of Guantanamo Bay serves as a warning about the potential for normalization of extrajudicial practices and the erosion of human rights. The facility's history indicates that, rather than improving, conditions tend to worsen in such detention settings, often leading to systemic abuses. Experts point out that states of exception, where normal legal protections are suspended, create a slippery slope that can have far-reaching consequences for all rights holders. The longer Guantanamo remains operational, the greater the risk of it becoming a focal point for future injustices and violence.
Last week, Donald Trump announced that Guantanamo Bay would be used to house the “worst criminal illegal aliens” and claimed that it would be drastically scaled up to hold as many as 30,000 people. In addition to its infamous role in the War on Terror, it’s the latest use of Gitmo as an immigration deterrent—and legal grey zone.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.