The FBI keeps getting its story wrong about New Orleans attack
Jan 3, 2025
auto_awesome
A suspected terrorist attack in New Orleans reveals the FBI's chaotic response and institutional failures. Mistakes by law enforcement erode public trust, amplifying fear. The discussion highlights unsettling parallels between the New Orleans and Las Vegas incidents, including the use of rented vehicles by military veterans. These incidents raise questions about accountability, systemic changes needed to prevent future tragedies, and the potential repercussions for FBI leadership amid calls for reform.
The FBI's conflicting statements post-attack reveal serious flaws in their communication strategies and crisis management protocols.
Local officials' insensitive responses, particularly Governor Landry's actions, exemplify a troubling disconnect between authorities and the grieving community.
Deep dives
FBI's Inconsistent Messaging
The FBI faced substantial criticism for its conflicting statements shortly after a tragic event in New Orleans, where a suspected terrorist attack left 15 dead and dozens injured. Initially, Special Agent Aletha Duncan declared that the event was not considered an act of terror, only for the FBI to later clarify that it was indeed under investigation as such. This dramatic shift in messaging raises significant questions about the Bureau’s communication strategies, especially given that the attacker was driving a truck adorned with an ISIS flag. The rapid pivots in the FBI's narrative not only confused the public but also highlighted severe lapses in situational awareness and crisis management.
Response and Public Relations Failures
The response from both the FBI and local officials in New Orleans displayed evident incompetence and arrogance following the attack. A midday press conference turned chaotic as reporters confronted officials about their inaccuracies, leading to an atmosphere of defensiveness rather than transparency. Governor Jeff Landry's decision to share a photo of himself dining out less than 24 hours after the event further underlined the disconnect between public sentiment and official responses, evoking outrage amidst the mourning community. This compounded the perception of mismanagement and a lack of accountability from key authorities during a critical moment.
Significant Questions Surrounding the Suspect
The suspect in the New Orleans attack, Shamsa Din Jabbar, raises numerous questions regarding the adequacy of preemptive measures taken by law enforcement. Having posted videos pledging allegiance to ISIS shortly before the attack, Jabbar's history and erratic behavior suggest missed opportunities for intervention. With a military background and recent disturbing actions, concerns have been amplified regarding the capacity of institutions to detect and address potential threats effectively. As investigations continue, the lack of clarity around Jabbar's motivations and connections fuels ongoing debates about national security and institutional failures.
Become a supporter of the show - just $1 for the first month: https://unherd.com/undercurrents/
Emily breaks down the FBI’s response to a suspected terrorist attack in New Orleans in the early hours of 2025. Law enforcement and local officials made significant errors in the immediate aftermath of the tragedy that, according to Emily, reflect deep institutional failures.