Deborah Pearlstein, a legal expert from Princeton University, dives into the spectacle of Donald Trump's executive orders on his inauguration day. She explores whether these actions were truly about governance or just performance. The conversation covers the legal intricacies surrounding issues like the TikTok ban and environmental policies under new leadership. Pearlstein also discusses the unpredictable relationship between Trump's administration and a conservative Supreme Court, raising questions about birthright citizenship and executive power.
Trump's executive orders on issues like birthright citizenship and immigration reflect a strategic signaling to his base rather than legitimate policy changes.
The legal uncertainties surrounding Trump's orders will likely lead to significant litigation, emphasizing the need for informed advocacy among citizens.
Deep dives
Trump's First Day in Office: A Show of Power
On his inauguration day, President Trump utilized a televised event to sign numerous executive orders, which appeared more like a spectacle than a significant policy shift. The day began with typical formalities, including cabinet appointments, but swiftly transitioned to a rally atmosphere, suggesting an intent to engage his base rather than implement immediate changes. Notably, Trump rescinded multiple Biden-era executive actions, including a withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement, signaling a clear direction for his administration's priorities. This theatrical approach raised questions about the actual legal consequences of his orders, which were described as legal theater with little tangible effect.
Limits of Executive Orders Explained
Executive orders serve as directives within the executive branch and cannot impose requirements on individuals or organizations outside it. Many of Trump's orders aimed at immigration reform, like challenges to birthright citizenship and the cancellation of asylum appointments, enter a complex legal territory, where their practical implementation relies heavily on court outcomes. The uncertainty surrounding these orders serves to instill fear among undocumented individuals, even as their legal validity remains questionable. Legal experts have indicated that these measures could lead to significant lawsuits, particularly from organizations such as the ACLU, that argue their unconstitutionality.
The Impact of Legal Challenges on Executive Actions
The shifting political landscape and changes in the judiciary, particularly the Supreme Court, will influence how effectively Trump's executive orders can be enforced. While previous administrations have faced pushback on executive actions, the legal challenges arising from Trump's directives are expected to follow established patterns of litigation seen in his first term. Actions like the attempt to grant pardons related to the January 6th insurrection highlight serious implications for the rule of law, as they may embolden individuals who acted violently in support of his agenda. Legal experts caution that while these executive orders can create immediate concerns, many will face significant obstacles in courts, making it essential for citizens to engage in informed advocacy rather than react purely out of fear.
On the day he was inaugurated, Donald Trump set about signing executive orders on birthright citizenship, the TikTok ban, and withdrawing from various international bodies, treaties and accords. Has he shown up to test out the awesome powers of the executive branch—or was he just showing off for his fans?
Guest: Deborah Pearlstein, Director, Program in Law and Public Policy and Charles and Marie Robertson Visiting Professor in Law and Public Affairs at Princeton.
Want more What Next? Join Slate Plus to unlock full, ad-free access to What Next and all your other favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the What Next show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.