In this showdown, Zach and Max debate between brace frames and moment frames in structural engineering, discussing stiffness, strengths, and load transfer. They explore design considerations, deflection amplification, and overstrength in building resilience. The conversation also covers the balance between brace frames and moment frames for seismic requirements and architectural objectives, highlighting the architectural influence on frame choices in different building types.
48:54
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Moment frames are significantly heavier than brace frames, offering greater architectural flexibility.
Brace frames are more cost-effective and efficient in resisting drift limits compared to moment frames.
Deep dives
Moment Frames vs. Brace Frames Weight Comparison
When comparing the weight per linear foot of moment frames and brace frames, the moment frames are significantly heavier. For a 10-foot bay, the moment frame per linear foot weight is 108 pounds, while the brace frame is only 47 pounds. As the bay size increases, the moment frame weight slightly decreases from 108 to 76 pounds per linear foot, whereas the brace frame weight increases from 47 to 44 pounds per linear foot for a 20-foot bay.
Architectural Flexibility and Layout Constraints
Moment frames offer greater architectural flexibility compared to brace frames. Moment frames allow for open structures and greater flexibility for future development, making them suitable for buildings where layout changes may occur. In contrast, brace frames pose limitations in architectural flexibility, especially when it comes to placing braces in locations that may interfere with window placements or interior design.
Design Considerations: Stiffness and Strength Requirements
In terms of stiffness and strength requirements, brace frames are known for their simplicity and straightforward design. They are more efficient in resisting drift limits, especially for mid to low-rise buildings. Moment frames, on the other hand, face challenges in meeting drift limits and require substantial column sizes due to the bending elements involved in transferring lateral forces.
Construction Costs: Moment Frames vs. Brace Frames
When considering construction costs, brace frames are typically more cost-effective compared to moment frames. Moment frames are reported to be three times the cost of brace frames for resisting the same amount of lateral forces. Labor costs associated with moment frames are also notably higher, reflecting the complexity and detailing requirements of these systems.
This episode of the structural engineering podcast is a showdown of epic proportions, BRACE yourself, or maybe reserve a MOMENT to listen to the show? Zach and Max compete for the best R=3 system and discuss where they hold advantages. So pick your team, and join in.
And, We're getting much closer to the launch of connors course (Episode 77), I'll certainly be joining in and I even get the chance to learn a little python for this episode to help team BF win. So check out his link below. https://www.structuralpython.com/