Daily Politics from the New Statesman Should breaking manifesto pledges be illegal?
Jan 16, 2026
A listener voices frustration over broken Labour promises and asks if manifesto pledges should be legally binding. The hosts delve into the implications of enforcing such laws. They also discuss the rising issue of council tax, highlighting funding cuts and the need for reform. Additionally, they ponder how a semicircular House of Commons might change political dynamics. Each question sparks lively debate and insightful commentary on the mechanics of UK politics.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Why Manifesto Laws Would Be Unworkable
- Legally forcing parties to honour manifestos is impractical because facts change and judges would struggle to grade broad promises.
- Rachel Cunliffe and Anoush Chakelian argue democratic accountability is best served by elections and parliamentary checks, not rigid laws.
Enforcement Creates New Political Chaos
- Defining and enforcing manifesto commitments would create chaotic processes about who judges progress and what counts as success.
- The hosts warn that booting governments out mid-term or appointing panels would be messy and undemocratic.
Make Manifestos Clearer Not Legalistic
- If manifestos risk legal penalties, parties will avoid detail and produce vague, low-commitment documents.
- The hosts suggest shorter, clearer manifestos that bridge campaign promises and practical government plans would be healthier.