How Bad Is It?: Three Political Scientists Say America Is No Longer a Democracy
49 snips
Dec 11, 2025 Political scientists Daniel Ziblatt and Stephen Levitsky, both from Harvard, join Lucan A. Way from the University of Toronto to discuss America's shift toward authoritarianism. They explore the concept of 'competitive authoritarianism,' highlighting how recent political developments under Trump fit this model. With insights on the rapidity of this decline, the risks of media self-censorship, and why civil society still holds potential for resistance, they provide a nuanced view of America's political landscape and possible paths forward.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
U.S. Enters Competitive Authoritarianism
- Levitsky, Ziblatt, and Way conclude the U.S. has entered competitive authoritarianism after Trump's second-term consolidation.
- They define it as elections persisting while the ruling party rigs institutions to favor itself.
A Rapid, Extra‑Legal Authoritarian Turn
- The U.S. shift was unusually rapid and extra-legal compared with Hungary or Turkey, happening in weeks rather than through slow legal changes.
- Levitsky highlights direct weaponization like blocking law firms tied to rivals as a stark marker of that speed.
Authoritarian Moment, Not Finality
- Calling the moment authoritarian doesn't mean permanent dictatorship; it signals an active authoritarian offensive within a federal system.
- Daniel Ziblatt stresses the outcome depends on pushback and whether opposition sustains collective action.



