A three-judge appellate court panel heard arguments regarding the constitutionality of the gag order Judge Tanya Chutkan placed on Donald Trump in an attempt to prevent him from endangering witnesses, court staff, prosecutors and their family members. In a very spirited 2.5-hour argument, the judges had pointed questions for both the prosecution and the defense. Glenn reviews the appellate court's arguments from the perspective of someone who was inside the courtroom watching it live as it happened.

If you're interested in supporting our all-volunteer efforts and mission, you can becoming a Team Justice patron at:

For our Team Justice and Justice Matters merchandise visit:

https://shop.spreadshirt.com/glennkir...

Check out Glenn's website at glennkirschner.com

Follow Glenn on:

Threads: https://www.threads.net/glennkirschner2

Twitter: https://www.twitter.com/glennkirschner2

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/glennkirschner2

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/glennkirsch...

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

Appellate Court Hears Arguments on the Constitutionality of Judge Chutkan's Gag Order