CoinDesk Podcast Network

The Blockspace Pod: How Bitcoin engineers are solving the quantum risk

Jan 24, 2026
A technical deep dive into how Bitcoin could survive quantum computers. Short explorations of hash-based, lattice-based and STARK aggregation approaches. Discussion of proposals like BIP 360, OP_CAT and BIP 347 and their trade offs. A look at the huge signature sizes, block space impact and the massive logistics of migrating millions of addresses before Q-Day.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Signature Size Drives Big Trade-Offs

  • Quantum-resistant signatures are currently orders of magnitude larger than Bitcoin's 64-byte signatures.
  • Larger signatures would cut Bitcoin capacity and raise fees materially.
INSIGHT

Hash Schemes Are Safe But Huge

  • Hash-based signatures are well-studied and rely on simple assumptions like hash preimage resistance.
  • Their main drawback is extreme size: 7,000–17,000 bytes per signature.
INSIGHT

Lattice Options Offer Size But Less Vetting

  • Lattice-based schemes like Falcon and Dilithium are far more compact and fast to verify.
  • They carry more uncertainty because they are newer and less battle-tested.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app