On The Atlantic’s “The UN’s Gaza Statistics Make No Sense” (06/05/24)
Jun 6, 2024
auto_awesome
Graeme Wood from The Atlantic discusses skepticism towards Gaza death statistics. The podcast critiques the dehumanization of Palestinians, challenges in reporting casualty numbers, and the importance of accurate data in conflict zones.
Questioning credibility of Palestinian death statistics in conflict zones.
Importance of independent verification of data sources like the UN and Hamas.
Advocating for embedding journalists for transparency in conflict reporting.
Deep dives
Framing the Gazan Death Toll Controversy
The article discusses the controversy surrounding the Gazan death toll, emphasizing the reliance on data from Palestinians themselves, which is called into question. It criticizes the lack of transparency in how statistics are produced and questions the credibility of sources like the UN and Hamas.
Challenging Data Source Reliability
The piece questions the reliability of data sources, particularly focusing on the UN's methodology and the challenges in obtaining accurate numbers in conflict zones. It highlights discrepancies in reporting and suggests the need for independent verification of statistics to address the credibility issues.
Journalist Embedment Proposal
The article suggests embedding journalists to provide first-hand accounts of wars and conflicts, implying that this transparency could potentially legitimize actions such as targeting combatants hiding among civilians. It raises the argument that legal killings, even of children, are sometimes justified in warfare scenarios.
Implications of Statistical Manipulation
It intimates that manipulating statistics and data for propagandistic purposes, as noticed in the context of Gaza, can have serious consequences. The piece debates the fragility of credibility in reporting in conflict zones and the ethical implications of transparency and accountability in recording casualties.
Critique of Journalistic Transparency and Objectivity
The article concludes with a suggestion for increased transparency in conflict reporting, advocating for journalistic scrutiny as a means of verifying casualty figures. However, it also raises concerns about the potential consequences of such transparency on public perception and the accountability of warring parties.
Beatrice, Abby and Phil discuss a recent article by The Atlantic staff writer Graeme Wood that went viral for its assertion that, in the context of the genocide in Palestine, “it is possible to kill children legally.” We take a close look at the piece and how the rest of the surrounding argument uses a veneer of data “objectivity” to mask its underlying idea: that Palestinian death statistics cannot be trusted simply because they are collected by Palestinians themselves.
Transcript: www.deathpanel.net/transcripts/atlantic-gaza-statistics
Find our book Health Communism here: www.versobooks.com/books/4081-health-communism
Find Jules' new book, A Short History of Trans Misogyny, here:
https://www.versobooks.com/products/3054-a-short-history-of-trans-misogyny
Death Panel merch here (patrons get a discount code): www.deathpanel.net/merch
As always, support Death Panel at www.patreon.com/deathpanelpod
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode