Nullius in Verba Episode 72: Scientismus - I
20 snips
Jan 2, 2026 The discussion tackles scientism, exploring whether it's too much to claim science as the sole way of knowing. They delve into the historical evolution of the term and its varying interpretations. Key debates include the ability of science to answer moral questions and the distinction between disciplines in producing knowledge. The duo also critiques reliance on quantification in social research, favoring literary insights for deep understanding. Ultimately, they weigh the roles of empirical science versus philosophical inquiry in grasping complex human experiences.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Multiple Faces Of Scientism
- Scientism has many meanings, from neutral habits of scientists to the claim science is the only path to truth.
- Famous thinkers (e.g., Bertrand Russell) exemplify the strongest, controversial form of scientism.
Weak Versus Strong Scientism
- Weak scientism says science is the best way to gain empirical, falsifiable knowledge.
- Strong scientism claims science is the only route to any knowledge, which is more controversial.
Different Kinds Of Knowledge
- Different disciplines produce different kinds of knowledge (scientific, mathematical, philosophical).
- Moti Mizrahi argues we should treat these knowledge types distinctly rather than collapse them under 'science'.
