Political Fix
The right to die: who should have the final say?
Feb 14, 2025
Robert Shrimsley offers keen insights into British politics, alongside Stephen Bush, author of the acclaimed Inside Politics newsletter, and Laura Hughes, the Financial Times' public policy correspondent. They delve into the heated debate over the assisted dying bill, questioning the removal of judicial approval and its implications for safeguards. The conversation also touches on the emotional and ethical dimensions of end-of-life choices, public sentiment, and the intersection of political beliefs and healthcare equity. Additionally, they analyze the impact of recent developments in the Ukraine conflict and UK defense spending needs.
36:06
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The proposed removal of high court approval in the assisted dying bill has ignited fierce debates about legislative safeguards and public confidence.
- Trump's unexpected proposals regarding Ukraine have heightened concerns over European national security, prompting discussions on military spending and self-reliance.
Deep dives
Key Changes in the Assisted Dying Bill
The recent amendments to the assisted dying bill have sparked intense debate, particularly around the removal of the requirement for a high court judge's approval. This significant change proposes that a panel of experts—potentially excluding a judge—will now review applications. Critics argue this modification weakens the bill, raising concerns about its safety and eroding public confidence in the legislative process. As discussions unfold, questions persist regarding the bill's viability and the shifting opinions among MPs about its future.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
