Michigan to suspend Sherrone Moore, Rivalries that need to come back & Fixing Schedules for the Fans
May 12, 2025
auto_awesome
Discussion kicks off with Michigan's self-imposed suspension for Sherrone Moore amid text deletion scandals, raising questions about NCAA penalties. The excitement around Notre Dame and Clemson's new long-term scheduling agreement highlights strategic shifts in college football. A passionate plea for reviving lost rivalries emerges, emphasizing the thrill these matchups bring. Finally, Klatt dives into possible scheduling reforms that balance competitive fairness with fan enjoyment, advocating for a thoughtful structure to improve the college football experience.
33:00
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Michigan's self-imposed two-game suspension on Sherrone Moore raises concerns about NCAA governance and institutions prioritizing self-interest over integrity.
The long-term scheduling agreement between Clemson and Notre Dame signifies the importance of lucrative matchups while questioning the broader impact on college football's collaborative dynamics.
Deep dives
Michigan's Self-Imposed Suspension
Michigan plans to impose a two-game suspension on coach Sharon Moore due to allegations of deleting text messages related to the Connor Stallions sign-stealing controversy. This suspension, taking effect during the third and fourth games of the season, is seen as a strategic move to mitigate the impact of the upcoming NCAA meeting in June regarding past infractions. By timing the suspension to avoid crucial early games, Michigan aims to allow Moore to maintain coaching continuity with the team and potentially avoid harsher penalties from the NCAA later. Critics argue that this self-serving strategy highlights the flaws in NCAA governance, as institutions navigate regulations to serve their own interests rather than the integrity of college football.
Clemson and Notre Dame's Scheduling Agreement
Clemson and Notre Dame announced a 12-year scheduling agreement starting in 2027, which secures high-stakes matchups for both schools. This strategic agreement benefits Notre Dame as an independent by guaranteeing marquee games to enhance its television revenue and marketability, while Clemson leverages its status as a powerhouse program to maximize its television viewership and revenue streams. The move also reflects the evolving dynamics in college football, wherein institutions prioritize self-interest over collaborative scheduling that could benefit the sport as a whole. This trend encourages schools to lock in valuable matchups, yet raises questions about whether such decisions ultimately strengthen their respective conferences or the overall college football landscape.
The Need for a Revised Governance Structure
The discussion emphasizes the necessity for a centralized governing body dedicated solely to college football affairs, which could provide timely and effective management of scheduling, penalties, and other significant issues. Current NCAA procedures are criticized for being overly bureaucratic and slow, which results in punitive measures that often misalign with timely governance needed in a fast-paced sport. By creating a singular regulatory organization, college football can achieve greater efficiency in dealing with problems like sign-stealing and scheduling conflicts, ultimately enhancing the experience for players and fans. A restructured governance model could facilitate solutions that prioritize the sport's integrity and maintain fair competition among institutions.
Federal Legislation and the Future of College Football
A newly formed commission in collegiate athletics, co-chaired by Nick Saban, aims to address pressing issues within the sport, including player movement, revenue sharing, and scheduling imbalances. This initiative highlights the potential need for federal legislation to provide a sustainable framework that benefits all stakeholders, including players, institutions, and fans alike. Saban is expected to advocate for changes that offer a balanced approach to NIL rights while limiting unrestricted player movement that could affect competition. The commission represents a hopeful step toward creating a more structured and equitable environment in college football, fostering a future that enhances both the integrity of the game and the experiences of its participants.
FOX Sports’ lead College Football analyst Joel Klatt reacts to the news that Michigan is going to self-impose a 2-game suspension on Head Coach Sherrone Moore for deleting text messages with Connor Stallions. He discusses whether that penalty and whether the Wolverines should still expect further punishment from the NCAA. He also applauds the news of Notre Dame and Clemson announcing a long-term scheduling agreement while pointing out the motivations for the move. He also lists rivalry games that are no longer played on an annual basis that need to be brought back on the schedule every single season. Klatt also considers the pros and cons of individual schools controlling their own schedule every season before proposing a model that can ensure an equal playing field while also providing fans the best games possible.
0:00-1:42 Intro 1:43-11:03 Sherrone Moore Suspension 11:04-13:17 Michigan President Santa Ono’s move to Florida 13:18- 17:22 Joel Klatt’s thoughts on Clemson & Notre Dame scheduling agreement 17:23 - 20:48 Top 5 Non-Conference games that should be scheduled every year 20:49 - 22:53 How can the Non-Conference schedule be better? 22:54-24:04 Should the SEC move to a 9 Conference game schedule? 24:05 - 28:14 Joel’s dream CFB schedule 28:15-31:15 Presidential Commission w/ Co-Chair Nick Saban
