Explore the controversial figure of Andrew "weev" Auernheimer, who boldly challenged the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act while indulging in chaotic trolling. Discover the origins of his infamy, from childhood gaming disruptions to prominent cyberbullying cases. Delve into his struggles with self-representation in legal battles, particularly at Occupy Wall Street, where he faced the complexities of computer crime laws. Uncover the surprising support he received from the Electronic Frontier Foundation in his fight against what many consider unjust legislation.
Andrew 'Weev' Auernheimer's controversial actions against the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act raise moral dilemmas about ethical justifications for bad behavior in activism.
Thor Eklund's transition from corporate law to defending Weev highlights the complexities of legal challenges surrounding digital rights and unauthorized access issues.
Deep dives
Thor Eklund's Journey from Disillusionment to Legal Advocacy
In his early thirties, Thor Eklund shifted from a struggling Broadway production manager to a corporate law associate, only to find himself deeply unhappy and grappling with alcoholism after five years. Seeking a more fulfilling career, he ventured into criminal defense law, despite having no experience and facing financial difficulties, leading to a personal crisis as he approached 40. Thor's wife, a budding photojournalist, serendipitously connected him with Andrew 'Weave' Orenheimer during the Occupy Wall Street protests, where Weave was known for stirring controversy. This meeting became a turning point, as Thor, desperate to make a difference, offered to defend Weave, despite his own legal inexperience.
Weave's Online Infamy and Legal Troubles
Andrew Orenheimer, known as Weave, gained notoriety for his provocative online posts and participation in extreme trolling, which included targeting public figures and campaigning alongside chaotic groups like the Gay N***er Association of America. His infamous acts included orchestrating a high-profile cyberbullying incident against blogger Kathy Sierra, which forced her to retreat from public life. Weave's reputation led him to a criminal case regarding unauthorized access in relation to a significant security breach at AT&T, wherein he and an accomplice harvested the email addresses of numerous high-profile iPad users. This legal battle highlighted the complexities of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, as the prosecution argued against Weave's actions while his defense claimed they were not truly unauthorized.
The Trial and Its Aftermath
During Weave's trial, Thor Eklund faced significant challenges due to Weave's notorious public image and the prosecution's compelling arguments framed as a digital trespass. Eklund focused his defense on challenging the definitions of unauthorized access, suggesting that the nature of the information retrieval did not equate to criminal activity. Weave's courtroom antics, including live-tweeting during the proceedings, generated media buzz but failed to win the jury's sympathy, resulting in a guilty verdict within just two hours. After his sentencing, Eklund shifted his focus to the appeals process, gaining unexpected support from the Electronic Frontier Foundation and top legal experts, setting the stage for a battle against federal charges in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.
Much like Aaron Swartz did, Andrew "weev" Auernheimer fought against the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a law both men belived to be dangerous and unjust. But unlike Swartz, the internet's own boy, weev is an unapologetic troll who spread bile and chaos wherever he goes, a man who seemed to take pleasure in making others miserable. His fight raises a thorny question: when a bad person fights for a good cause, how should we feel about it?