Dealers and Brokers in Proxy Wars: Exploring All Means Available
Nov 17, 2023
auto_awesome
This podcast explores the role of intermediaries and the complexities of proxy wars. It discusses lessons learned from past conflicts and the involvement of various actors. Topics include the introduction of Stinger missiles in Afghanistan, plausible deniability in covert actions, meticulous planning during the bin Laden raid, lessons from history on great powers in proxy wars, and the role of decisiveness in these conflicts.
Proxy conflicts involve indirect military intervention through armed non-state actors, requiring strategic alignment and management of intermediate relationships.
Managing proxy conflicts requires understanding and navigating the agency of intermediaries and agents, aligning interests, and effective communication.
Historical examples emphasize the importance of strategic alignment, engagement with intermediaries, clear objectives, and comprehensive understanding in successfully managing proxy conflicts.
Deep dives
The Complexity of Proxy Conflict
Proxy conflict involves indirect military intervention where a state supports an armed non-state actor, usually a rebel group. It is a strategic option used by countries to achieve their objectives through proxies. The relationship between the principal and the intermediary is not static, and interests can diverge over time. Strategic alignment and the management of intermediate relationships are crucial to achieving success. The role of intermediaries can vary, from serving as an honest broker to a self-interested dealer. Time also plays a significant role, with long-term conflicts requiring consistency and patience. Proxy conflicts can take different forms based on the strategic context, such as counter-terrorism or great power competition. The agency of both intermediaries and agents must be considered, as they have their own interests and can influence the dynamics of the conflict.
The Challenges of Principal-Intermediary-Agent Dynamics
Managing proxy conflicts requires constant attention and navigation of interests among the principal, intermediary, and agent. Interests can diverge, and intermediaries may have their own agendas, which can impact the relationship with the principal. Principals must understand the agency of intermediaries and agents and their ability to shape the relationship. Intermediaries can manipulate the relationship from the bottom-up, while top-down influence from the principal can also shape the dynamic. It is a delicate balance of managing interests, aligning objectives, and maintaining effective communication in the face of complex geopolitical relationships. Time also plays a role, as conflicts can be protracted, requiring long-term engagement and alignment of interests.
Lessons from Historical Examples
Historical examples, such as the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and the conflict in Syria, provide valuable insights into proxy conflict. The success of proxy wars in the 80s in Afghanistan was influenced by strategic alignment, engagement with intermediaries, and effective decision-making. However, challenges arose in more recent conflicts, like Syria, due to policy decisions that constrained aid and delayed support. The role of intermediaries, like Pakistan, in supporting proxy conflicts can vary based on their own interests and strategic calculations. Decisiveness, clear objectives, and a comprehensive understanding of the conflict dynamics are crucial for successfully managing proxy conflicts.
Implications for Policymakers and Practitioners
Policymakers and practitioners must recognize the complexities and challenges of proxy conflicts. Decisive decision-making, alignment of interests, and effective communication are critical. Understanding and managing the agency of intermediaries and agents is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Proxy conflicts require long-term commitments and patience, as well as a comprehensive understanding of the geopolitical landscape. Indirect engagement through intermediaries can provide a level of deniability and escalation control, but it requires careful management and coordination. Policymakers should also consider the evolving nature of proxy conflicts in the context of great power competition and adapt their strategies accordingly.
The Need for Continued Research
Proxy conflicts continue to be relevant in the contemporary security environment, but they take different forms and require ongoing research and analysis. Scholars and practitioners should further explore the dynamics of proxy conflicts, including the role of intermediaries, agency of agents, and effective strategies for managing conflicts. Considering the historical lessons and the evolving geopolitical landscape, research in this field can inform policymakers and practitioners in their efforts to navigate and address the challenges posed by proxy conflicts.
Be sure to visit the Irregular Warfare Initiative website to see all of the new articles, podcast episodes, and other content the IWI team is publishing!
When two adversaries confront one another militarily, they are rarely the only participants. Either side might delegate portions of its war efforts to proxies, for example. But there are a wide range of other roles that intermediaries also play. This episode explores those roles and features a discussion with Dr. Michael G. Vickers, former US under secretary of defense for intelligence, and Dr. Vladimir Rauta, an associate professor at the University of Reading.