The Crisis Room Q&A: Can Tomahawk missiles win the war for Ukraine?
Oct 20, 2025
This engaging Q&A tackles the implications of Trump potentially supplying Ukraine with Tomahawk missiles and how it could damage Russia. The hosts delve into Hamas's violent actions in Gaza and the obstacles they pose to peace. They also explore the political dynamics of the UN's role in the Middle East ceasefire and discuss the national security threats posed by China and climate change. Meanwhile, a playful interaction about the show's format adds a light-hearted touch!
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Energy Strikes Raise Political Pressure
- Long-range strikes have already degraded 30–40% of Russian oil refining capacity and raise political pressure on Moscow.
- Mark Urban doubts a small Tomahawk transfer alone would decisively change the campaign without large numbers and launch solutions.
Tomahawk Limits Versus Hype
- Tomahawks offer long range and precision but are most effective when fired in large salvos and with adequate launch platforms.
- Limited numbers and possible U.S. target controls mean Tomahawks alone likely won't tip the balance, says Mark Urban.
Trump's Politics Shape Weapons Policy
- Donald Trump's personal politics matter: he likes backing winners and hurting rivals, which makes weapons that damage Russia politically appealing to him.
- Marc Polymeropoulos argues this political dynamic could influence any U.S. decision on providing strike systems like Tomahawks.