
New Books in East Asian Studies
Don J. Wyatt, "Slavery in East Asia" (Cambridge UP, 2022)
Episode guests
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Slavery in East Asia had distinct power dynamics between ministers and sovereigns, reflected in servile terminology and imbalanced relationships.
- Slavery in East Asia was not racially based, leading to its invisible visibility and a market for enslaving Africans and Southeast Asians.
Deep dives
Slavery in East Asia: Exploring the Historical Context
Slavery in East Asia, particularly in China, was prevalent during the Ming and Qing dynasties and had a distinct relationship between ministers and sovereigns. Ministerial correspondence to the emperor often used deprecatory self-addresses, reflecting a servile and dependent relationship. Terminology like 'chun' (minister or servant) highlighted the imbalanced power dynamics. Slavery in East Asia was not strictly racially based, unlike in Europe and the Americas, leading to its invisible visibility. The institution was perpetuated by changes in the law, such as the Tang Code, which made it illegal to enslave Chinese commoners, resulting in an increased market for enslaving Africans and Southeast Asians. Chinese historiography on slavery has been influenced by Marxist perspectives, but there are promising signs of new research emerging and a growing interest in uncovering hidden histories related to slavery.