The Promise and Peril of Open Source AI with Elizabeth Seger and Jeffrey Ladish
Nov 21, 2023
auto_awesome
Elizabeth Seger and Jeffrey Ladish, AI development experts, discuss the complexities of open source AI systems, the need for true democratization of AI, the promise and peril of fine-tuning models, and the risks of open source AI. They also explore the importance of regulation and policy in AI development.
Open sourcing AI models can accelerate scientific research and democratize access, but caution is needed to mitigate potential misuse and ensure responsible decision-making.
Clear definitions of AI democratization and caution in handling highly capable models are necessary to avoid 'democracy washing' and assess risks effectively.
Deep dives
The Debate Over Open Sourcing AI
The podcast explores the debate over open sourcing artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential consequences. Opening up AI models could accelerate scientific research, boost productivity, and democratize access to AI technology. However, it also raises concerns about potential misuse, such as the creation of biological weapons or disinformation campaigns. The irreversible nature of open source AI models amplifies the importance of making the right decisions. The podcast emphasizes the need for clear definitions, rigorous risk assessments, and responsible regulation by governments. It suggests alternatives to full open sourcing and highlights the importance of international coordination in shaping a stable state for AI development.
Different Meanings of AI Democratization
The podcast discusses the various meanings associated with AI democratization. It highlights four common definitions used by tech companies: democratizing AI development, democratizing use, sharing the AI bounty globally, and distributing benefits more equally. The episode unpacks how these definitions can be misconstrued and industry rhetoric can distort the true implications of open sourcing AI. It calls for a clear understanding of what constitutes true democratization versus 'democracy washing', where companies claim to democratize while pursuing less democratic objectives. The podcast acknowledges that while democratizing AI development and use can be beneficial, caution is needed when handling highly capable models and assessing potential risks.
Safety Challenges in Open Source AI
The podcast explores the safety challenges associated with open source AI models. It uses the example of the LAMA2 model released by Meta and demonstrates how easily safety controls can be compromised when model weights are accessible. This highlights the need for careful consideration when deciding to open source highly capable models. It emphasizes that the power and potential of these models go beyond what can be found through general internet searches, and the evolving capabilities of AI require proactive regulation and risk assessment. The podcast argues for a stage release strategy that involves iterative evaluation and safety measures, reinforcing the need for oversight and responsible decision-making.
Creating a Stable State for Open Source AI
The podcast discusses the importance of reaching a stable state in open source AI development. It suggests several key steps to achieve this. First, acknowledging that not all highly capable AI models should be open sourced without thorough risk assessment. Second, making informed decisions by conducting rigorous risk assessments and implementing responsible scaling policies. Third, considering alternative release options that capture the benefits of open sourcing while mitigating risks. Fourth, promoting international cooperation and creating standard-setting bodies to address AI regulation and policy. Finally, governments should exercise oversight, enforce safety measures, and ensure open source AI models are regulated and evaluated through standardized procedures. The podcast acknowledges the challenges ahead but expresses optimism about the growing recognition of AI risks and the progress being made in international dialogue and governmental initiatives.
As AI development races forward, a fierce debate has emerged over open source AI models. So what does it mean to open-source AI? Are we opening Pandora’s box of catastrophic risks? Or is open-sourcing AI the only way we can democratize its benefits and dilute the power of big tech?
Correction: When discussing the large language model Bloom, Elizabeth said it functions in 26 different languages. Bloom is actually able to generate text in 46 natural languages and 13 programming languages - and more are in the works.
This report, co-authored by Elizabeth Seger, attempts to clarify open-source terminology and to offer a thorough analysis of risks and benefits from open-sourcing AI
This paper, co-authored by Jeffrey Ladish, demonstrates that it’s possible to effectively undo the safety fine-tuning from Llama 2-Chat 13B with less than $200 while retaining its general capabilities
Supports governments, technology companies, and other key institutions by producing relevant research and guidance around how to respond to the challenges posed by AI