Fani Willis, Chief Law of Trump correspondent, discusses the challenges in prosecuting Trump and associates, including ethical violations and proving personal benefit. The podcast also explores judicial oversight, conflicts of interest, and the influence of dark money in the legal system. Lastly, the discussion touches on navigating post-Trump era challenges and the need for a cross-ideological coalition to confront authoritarian threats in the judicial system.
Challenges in disqualifying AG Fani Willis from the Fulton County election subversion case raise concerns over prosecution's viability.
Justice Thomas' recusal guidelines questioned, emphasizing the need for Supreme Court justices to follow ethical standards.
Public pressure, congressional action, and a popular movement are necessary to hold the Supreme Court accountable and implement reform.
Deep dives
Dark Money Influence on the Supreme Court
The podcast episode discusses the influence of dark money on the Supreme Court and highlights the connections between corruption, excessive luxury, and the court's reactionary policy outcomes. It emphasizes the need to connect the dots and expose the agenda behind the court's decisions. The episode argues that public pressure is essential in holding the court accountable, but also underscores the importance of congressional action in implementing reforms, such as an enforceable code of conduct for the court.
The Connection between Corruption and Policy Outcomes
The episode draws attention to the intimate connection between corruption within the Supreme Court, such as the acceptance of luxury trips, and the court's conservative policy outcomes. It links dark money influence to the court's efforts to reshape the composition of the judiciary and advance radical agendas, including attacks on women's rights and the dismantling of the American administrative state.
The Urgency of Confronting Judicial Power
The podcast episode underscores the urgent need to confront the power of the Supreme Court and address judicial corruption. It advocates for a popular movement that exposes the fiction surrounding the court and seeks common ground across ideologies. While it acknowledges the challenges ahead, it emphasizes the importance of building political capital, mobilizing public resistance, and achieving cross-ideological support for court reforms.
Building a Broad Coalition and Political Resistance
The episode highlights the significance of building a broad cross-ideological coalition to combat authoritarian threats posed by the Trump administration and the Supreme Court. It calls for finding common ground and mobilizing movements that unite labor groups, environmental advocates, and gun activists. The episode emphasizes the need to invest in politics and create public awareness around corruption, ultimately empowering representatives to fight for the necessary reforms.
Taking Action to Save Democracy
The episode concludes by urging listeners to take tangible action steps to address the current state of the Supreme Court and protect democracy. It encourages engagement with movements such as United for Democracy and emphasizes the importance of public pressure, dropping public faith in the court, and holding representatives accountable in order to create the political capital needed for meaningful reforms.
The future of the Fulton County, Georgia election subversion case against Donald J. Trump and many many accused co-conspirators was cast into doubt this week as the court saw evidentiary hearings in the defence’s motion to disqualify Fulton County AG Fani Willis. Dahlia Lithwick is joined by Slate’s chief Law of Trump correspondent Jeremy Stahl to discuss why, even with a very high bar for removing Willis from the case, the court was dragged through some tawdry details that are bound to come back to hurt the prosecution, one way or another.
Later in the show, executive director and co-founder of Court Accountability, Alex Aronson, talks with Dahlia about what could possibly be done to make Supreme Court justices follow reasonable recusal guidelines (we’re looking at you, Justice Thomas), and whether the American electorate might at last be finding an appetite for court reform.
Want more Amicus? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.