TBD | Elon Musk and Trump’s Shadow Transition Team
Dec 13, 2024
auto_awesome
Teddy Schleifer, a politics and wealth reporter for The New York Times, dives into the intriguing intersection of Silicon Valley and the Trump administration. He discusses how figures like Elon Musk and Larry Ellison influence political transitions, even without formal roles. Schleifer highlights the unconventional dynamics of these tech leaders shaping policy and appointments. He also explores the implications of wealthy donors navigating power in government and the evolving relationship between Trump and the tech industry amidst his populist approach.
Elon Musk and other Silicon Valley moguls are reshaping Trump's administration by prioritizing private sector efficiency over traditional political qualifications.
The significant financial contributions from tech leaders to Trump's campaign highlight ethical concerns regarding the influence of wealth on governance.
Deep dives
The Shift in Trump's Transition Team Dynamics
The dynamics of Trump's presidential transition team have shifted significantly since 2016, moving away from a public spectacle in New York City to a more discreet operation at Mar-a-Lago. Notable figures, including wealthy tech luminaries like Elon Musk and Larry Ellison, are shaping this new administration from behind the scenes, diverging from traditional norms where transitions were more visible and inclusive. The involvement of these tech moguls highlights a trend towards a cabinet populated by those with immense financial resources rather than political experience. This change suggests a broader influence of Silicon Valley on government, reflecting a growing intersection between wealth and political power.
Silicon Valley's Subtle Influence on Policy
A significant group of lesser-known Silicon Valley figures is taking on influential roles in Trump's cabinet selections, raising questions about their qualifications and the vetting process. Individuals related to Elon Musk, such as Jared Birchall, are reportedly interviewing candidates for important positions despite lacking formal government experience. This phenomenon indicates a shift towards trusting private sector perspectives on government efficiency, potentially prioritizing technological interests over traditional political qualifications. The focus of these tech contacts appears to align with reducing regulations and emphasizing private sector roles in government, particularly in areas like defense and technology.
The Complex Relationship Between Wealth and Governance
The infusion of significant financial contributions from tech leaders into Trump's campaign marks a complex relationship between wealth and political influence. High-profile donations have raised suspicions about donor services, where financial backers gain informal power through their contributions. The narrative suggests that, while these tech leaders throw their support behind Trump, they may also seek to secure their interests within a potentially hostile political environment. Ultimately, this relationship between affluent donors and political power raises ethical questions about the nature of governance and the prioritization of wealthy interests over the broader public good.
Elon Musk has been down in Florida with Donald Trump, inviting his fellow rich Silicon Valley friends to stop by and weigh in on the next administration. How could policy and personnel be shaped by this input from successful (if totally inexperienced in government) individuals?
Guest: Teddy Schleifer, covering politics for the New York Times.
Want more What Next TBD? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Disclosure in Podcast Description: A Bond Account is a self-directed brokerage account with Public Investing, member FINRA/SIPC. Deposits into this account are used to purchase 10 investment-grade and high-yield bonds. As of 9/26/24, the average, annualized yield to worst (YTW) across the Bond Account is greater than 6%. A bond’s yield is a function of its market price, which can fluctuate; therefore, a bond’s YTW is not “locked in” until the bond is purchased, and your yield at time of purchase may be different from the yield shown here. The “locked in” YTW is not guaranteed; you may receive less than the YTW of the bonds in the Bond Account if you sell any of the bonds before maturity or if the issuer defaults on the bond. Public Investing charges a markup on each bond trade. See our Fee Schedule. Bond Accounts are not recommendations of individual bonds or default allocations. The bonds in the Bond Account have not been selected based on your needs or risk profile. See https://public.com/disclosures/bond-account to learn more.