Cora Diamond, leading philosopher, discusses her contributions to Wittgenstein, logic, mind, language, ethics, and the philosophical inquiry into our relation as humans to other animals. Topics include Murdoch's rejection of traditional philosophy, the role of reactive attitudes, the usefulness of concepts and texts, reflection on experience and progress in philosophy, and Quine's naturalism compared to Murdoch's humanistic approach.
49:44
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Murdoch Off The Map
Iris Murdoch's ethics sits 'off the map' of standard analytic divisions and methods.
She champions a reflective empiricism focused on human experience rather than armchair intuition or science-driven methods.
insights INSIGHT
Reflective Empiricism As A Method
Philosophical methods are often reduced to armchair intuition or scientific engagement.
Murdoch (and Cora Diamond) propose an empiricism of reflection on human experience as a legitimate alternative.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Strawson's Reactive Attitudes Example
Peter Strawson's essay Freedom and Resentment draws attention to 'reactive attitudes' in everyday interpersonal life.
Strawson uses literature and shared human experience to reconceive debates about freedom and responsibility.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
*The handout for this lecture is available on the IMS Facebook Page (link in Bio) or by emailing ims@chi.ac.uk
Cora Diamond is a leading American philosopher who is well known for her contributions to the interpretation of Wittgenstein and Frege, for her contributions to the philosophy of logic, mind, language, as well as to ethics, the philosophy of literature, and the philosophical inquiry into our relation as humans to other animals.
Her three areas of greatest influence are in the philosophical foundations of logic, the interpretation of Wittgenstein, and the ethical treatment of animals. Partly under the influence of lessons she arrives at through her own original reading of Wittgenstein, she has criticised mainstream tendencies in analytic philosophy across a dizzying range of subdisciplines. Alongside publishing a dozen or so of the most widely discussed articles on Wittgenstein ever written, she has written several dozen articles advancing powerful and influential criticisms of almost every major living figure who takes themselves to be applying Wittgenstein’s ideas to some major area of philosophical research – be it in philosophical logic, contemporary moral theory, animal studies, philosophy and literature, or the study of the history of the analytic tradition of philosophy. Her work has thereby given rise to one whole movement in the interpretation of Wittgenstein (known in the contemporary literature as the resolute reading), to yet another in contemporary moral philosophy and metaethics (known as the realistic spirit approach to ethical problems), and to yet a third in the more narrowly focused field of the moral status of animals (known as the our fellow creatures approach).
She has taught at the Universities of Swansea, Sussex, Aberdeen and since 1971 at the University of Virginia, where she is now professor emerita.