The right to choose

The debate centers around whether individuals should have the right to erase bad memories if they choose to do so. The affirmative side argues that having the autonomy to modify and curate one's own memories is essential for mental well-being and personal growth. They emphasize the importance of cognitive liberty and the right to self-determination. The negative side raises concerns about the potential loss of valuable lessons and personal growth that can come from overcoming suffering. They argue that suffering is a natural part of life and can lead to resilience and compassion. They also raise ethical and policy concerns regarding unintended consequences, informed consent, and the potential for societal pressure to use memory erasure as a quick fix solution. Both sides acknowledge the complexity of the issue and the need for careful consideration and guidance when making decisions about memory alteration.