Unraveling the dark secrets of the Malmedy massacre, where German troops ruthlessly executed surrendering American soldiers during WWII. Delve into the military trial, defense strategies, and the controversial representation of convicted Nazis in post-war American politics.
The Malmedy massacre during World War II was a cold-blooded Nazi massacre of surrendering American troops.
A gruesome hoax around the massacre, concocted by Nazis, aimed to discredit the convictions and propagate false narratives.
Deep dives
The Malmady Massacre Incident
During World War II, the Americans faced a brutal massacre carried out by the Nazi SS tank unit, resulting in the execution of American prisoners of war in Belgium. The incident saw unarmed American soldiers, who had surrendered after an ambush, lined up and brutally killed by the Germans. Despite some survivors managing to escape and recount the horrific events to the press, the post-war scenes of discovering frozen unburied bodies sparked national outrage and calls for justice.
The Malmady Trial and Convictions
In the aftermath, a trial was conducted at the Dachau military court, where members of the German panzer unit, known as the Blowtorch Battalion, admitted their ruthless acts of killing unarmed prisoners of war during the Malmady massacre. Detailed confessions from the defendants, obtained by US Army investigators, served as crucial evidence. The court found all defendants guilty, resulting in sentences ranging from imprisonment to death, highlighting the severity of their crimes.
Willis Everett's Defense Strategy
Willis Everett, the lead defense attorney in the trial, faced challenges in defending the Nazi soldiers, as confessions and witness testimonies painted a damning picture of their actions. Despite attempting various defense strategies, including claims of coercion during confessions, the overwhelming evidence led to the eventual convictions. Everett's post-trial efforts to challenge the case and propagate false abuse allegations ultimately aimed to overturn the convictions.
Manipulation Post-Trial and Political Influence
Following the trial, a narrative emerged portraying the convicted Nazis as victims of abuse and coercion during the trial, which gained traction through propaganda and false testimonies. Rudolf Aschenauer, a German lawyer with Nazi ties, collaborated with the prisoners to distort the facts and fabricate accounts of torture. This deceitful campaign aimed to undermine the war crimes trials and discredit the convictions, perpetuating a narrative of innocence for the perpetrators.
One of the most shocking incidents of World War II for Americans -- a cold-blooded Nazi massacre of surrendering American troops -- gets weaponized against the United States by surviving Nazis hoping to return to power, as well as a group of Americans sympathetic to their cause. A gruesome hoax around the massacre, cooked up by the Nazis, will soon rocket through American politics.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode