Can Science Find God? feat. Stephen Meyer and Michael Shermer
Jun 2, 2023
auto_awesome
Dr. Stephen Meyer and Dr. Michael Shermer discuss the existence of God from a scientific perspective, exploring topics such as the potential of humans, metaphysical equality, fine-tuning for life, the origin of mind, deriving purpose, the nature of human beings and consciousness, the role of art and creativity, evidence for the Big Bang Theory, materialism, naturalism, and supernaturalism. They also touch on the speaker's personal journey towards belief in God.
The debate explores the concept of a prime reality or higher truth in the universe, discussing the idea of an intelligent designer and the complexity of life's digital code and the fine-tuning of the universe as evidence.
The discussion emphasizes that minds, based on our experience, are known to produce effects like digital code, complex systems, and fine-tuning, indicating that inference to a mind is rational.
The debate critiques alternate cosmological models such as quantum cosmology and multiverse theories, arguing that these models fail to explain the origin of life's digital code, information processing systems, and the fine-tuning of the universe.
The conversation highlights the power of art, music, and transcendent moments that provide a sense of purpose and connection to a higher truth beyond the materialistic view, invoking concepts like truth, beauty, and human potential as evidence of a deeper understanding of the world.
Deep dives
The potential existence of a prime reality
The debate explores the question of whether there is a prime reality or higher truth in the universe. It discusses the concept of a first mover or a mind behind the universe that provides purpose and governs behavior. It examines the contrast between materialism and the idea of an intelligent designer, highlighting examples like the complexity of life's digital code and the fine-tuning of the universe. The discussion delves into scientific and philosophical inferences, emphasizing the explanatory power of an intelligent mind and its ability to create specified complexity.
The importance of inferring minds from observable effects
The discussion explores how minds are key in explaining phenomena that possess characteristics like information, complexity, and fine-tuning. It argues that based on our experience, minds are known to produce effects like digital code, complex systems, and fine-tuning, indicating that inference to a mind is rational. It distinguishes between observable and unobservable entities and highlights the scientific principle of inference to the best explanation, where invoking an entity known to have the necessary powers is warranted.
Exploring alternate cosmological models and their limitations
The debate discusses alternate cosmological models such as quantum cosmology, cyclic models, and multiverse theories. It critiques these models on the grounds of needing unexplained fine-tuning or relying on pre-existing mathematics. It argues that these models, even with their variations, fail when it comes to explaining the origin of life's digital code, information processing systems, and the fine-tuning of the universe. It suggests that materialistic explanations fall short, while the inference to an intelligent mind provides a better explanation.
The significance of experiences that transcend the material realm
The conversation acknowledges the human capacity for experiences that go beyond materialistic impulses like sleeping, eating, and bodily needs. It highlights the power of art, music, and other transcendent moments that provide a sense of purpose and connection to something greater. It argues that these experiences point to the existence of a higher truth beyond the materialistic view, invoking concepts like truth, beauty, and human potential as evidence of a deeper understanding of the world.
Complexity arising from energy input
Complex adaptive systems can arise naturally by pouring energy into the system, resulting in complexity. This process counters entropy and leads to the emergence of ordered and complex structures, such as crystals or beehives. These self-organizational scenarios, explained by non-equilibrium thermodynamics, are effective in explaining highly redundant order. However, they do not account for the specified complexity and information found in living systems.
The limitations of order from energy input
While energy input can generate order and structured patterns, it does not explain the presence of specified complexity or information found in biological systems. For instance, pouring energy into a system can create vortices or spiral wave currents, like a vortex forming when draining a bathtub. However, this order lacks the specificity and complexity observed in biological organisms, which exhibit a code-like structure and perform intricate functions.
The potential of human beings and the mysteries of the mind
Human beings possess immense potential and have a unique ability to comprehend and explore the universe. Our capacity to understand and create is seemingly limitless. While we may not fully comprehend the mysteries of consciousness or the mind's interaction with the physical world, there is a quest for truth and a desire to uncover the highest truth. The existence of potential and the pursuit of knowledge hint at the presence of an objective truth and the intriguing possibility of a higher mind or intelligence.
Bryan hosts a discussion between Dr. Stephen Meyer and Dr. Michael Shermer about the existence of God from a scientific perspective. They ask the question: can science prove the existence of God?
Get Dr. Meyer's Return of the God Hypothesis here - https://rb.gy/lbmru Subscribe to Skeptic Magazine here - https://shop.skeptic.com/
Want more Bryan Callen?
You can buy tickets to one of his stand-up shows near you by visiting www.bryancallen.com/live
